• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ETHICON INC. PROLIFT PELVIC FLOOR REPAIR UNKNOWN PRODUCT; MESH, SURGICAL, SYNTHETIC, UROGYNECOLOGIC

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ETHICON INC. PROLIFT PELVIC FLOOR REPAIR UNKNOWN PRODUCT; MESH, SURGICAL, SYNTHETIC, UROGYNECOLOGIC Back to Search Results
Device Problem Patient-Device Incompatibility (2682)
Patient Problems Erosion (1750); Hematoma (1884); Unspecified Infection (1930); Pain (1994)
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).This report is related to a journal article, therefore no product will be returned for analysis and the batch history records cannot be reviewed as the lot number has not been provided.Attempts are being made to obtain the following information.If further details are received at the later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.Were the cases discussed in this article previously reported to ethicon? if yes, please provide a complaint reference number.Does the surgeon believe that ethicon products involved caused and/or contributed to the post-operative complications described in the article? does the surgeon believe there was any deficiency with the ethicon products used in this procedure? citation: south med j.2015; 108(12): 715¿721.Doi:10.14423/smj.0000000000000377.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
It was reported via journal article title : pain scores and exposure rates after polypropylene mesh for pelvic organ prolapse.Author: jana illston, md, jeffrey garris, md, ms, holly richter, md, phd, and thomas wheeler ii, md, msph.Citation: south med j.2015; 108(12): 715¿721.Doi:10.14423/smj.0000000000000377.The objectives of the study was to characterize pain and exposure after prolift placement and identify risk factors.A total of 183 patients (age: 57.9 ± 11.5; bmi: 29.2 ± 5.6) with pelvic organ prolapse (pop) who underwent placement of prolift vaginal mesh (ethicon) were surveyed and were included in the study.Patients who received the prolift vaginal mesh grafts in the institution were identified by a billing database query.Reported complications included post-operative pain (1.35), graft exposure (n-23), post-operative hematoma associated with mesh exposure (<0.01), post-operative change in hemoglobin associated with mesh exposure (0.36), and post-operative infection or wound breakdown associated with mesh exposure (0.82).It was reported that hematoma formation was associated with significantly increased odds of mesh exposure and change in hemoglobin has previously been shown to be associated with mesh exposure and perhaps this decrease in hemoglobin was related to hematoma formation.It is possible that increased post-operative pain may be related to larger permanent mesh load suggesting a potential for increases in contracture and scar formation.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PROLIFT PELVIC FLOOR REPAIR UNKNOWN PRODUCT
Type of Device
MESH, SURGICAL, SYNTHETIC, UROGYNECOLOGIC
Manufacturer (Section D)
ETHICON INC.
p.o. box 151, route 22 west
somerville NJ 08876 0151
Manufacturer (Section G)
ETHICON SARL-NEUCHATEL
puits-godet 20
neuchatel
SZ  
Manufacturer Contact
darlene kyle
p.o. box 151, route 22 west
somerville, NJ 08876-0151
9082182792
MDR Report Key7902211
MDR Text Key121562153
Report Number2210968-2018-75941
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code OTP
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K013718
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type health professional,literatur
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 08/29/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 08/29/2018
Initial Date FDA Received09/24/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-