A heli-fx endoanchoring system was used prophylactically in a patient as an accessory device with non-mdt stent graft for an unknown thoracic endovascular treatment.It was reported the endoanchors were implanted at the distal end of the stent graft.It was reported that a 32mm guide was selected and one endoanchor was successfully implanted but while attempting to implant the second endoanchor it was reported the applier was unable to advance out of the guide.Per the physician, the cause of the event was product related and not due to user error.It was noted that the physician was being very careful not to over manipulate or over torque the guide.It was also reported that the markers on the guide appeared distorted under fluoroscopy when attempting to position the guide.The linear marker on the guide appeared to have moved so the markers looked like they had more of an acute angle rather than 90 degrees.Another 32mm heli-fx guide was then used instead but distortion of the markers was also reported with this guide.A 42mm heli-fx guide was then used to successfully complete the procedure.Per the physician, the cause of the event was product related and not due to user error.It was noted that the physician was being very careful not to over manipulate or over torque the guide no additional clinical sequelae were reported and the patient is fine.
|
Additional information received reported that it was confirmed that the case was a thoraco-abdominal aneurysm (taaa) and endoanchors were used in the distal part of the stent graft.The diameter at the bottom of the aorta was 33-34mm with no tortuosity noted.Non-medtronic stent grafts inserted were all 40mm in diameter - the top was 40x100mm, middle 40x150mm and bottom 40x200 mm.Film evaluation summary: the cause of the report of the applier unable to be advanced out of the guide during the second anchor implant, as well as the markers on the guide appearing distorted under fluoroscopy during positioning, could not be determined from the limited images returned.Films during implant were not available for return; therefore, the reported events could not be assessed.Analysis of the returned films did not reveal any endoanchor or anatomical characteristics that could explain the reported event.A device issue cannot be ruled out as a potential cause.The guides have been returned for investigation and are pending analysis.The results will be summarized in a separate report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|