Manufacturing review: the device history records have been reviewed with special attention to the raw materials, subassemblies, manufacturing process, and quality control testing.This lot met all release criteria.There was nothing found to indicate there was a manufacturing related cause for this event.This is the only complaint reported to date for this lot number and failure mode.Investigation summary: the crosser s6 catheter was not returned.Tip detachment could not be confirmed from the two images provided.The investigation is inconclusive for the alleged tip detachment.The root cause could not be determined based upon available information.It is unknown whether patient and/or procedural factors contributed to the event.Labeling review: the review of the ifu (instructions for use), indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, and contraindications showed that the product labeling is adequate.The information provided by bard represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bard.
|
It was reporting that during treatment of an occlusion in the mid sfa, after approximately three minutes and thirty seconds of activation, the distal tip of the recanalization catheter allegedly detached and remained embedded in the lesion.It was further reported that the health care provider determined not to retrieve the tip since the detached tip would not cause any health hazard to the patient.Therefore, the catheter was removed without incident.There was no reported patient injury.
|