A customer reported following implant of a glaucoma filtration device, there was no aqueous flow observed from the device itself, but from around it in the patient's eye.The surgeon removed and replaced the device two days following the initial implant.During the replacement surgery, the surgeon enlarged the incision and removed the device.Another device was implanted and the patient is currently showing favorable progress.Additional information was requested.
|
The sample was returned for the investigation: only the shunt was returned and found to be clogged.Therefore, the complaint is confirmed.After the cleaning the lumen was open.There is no indication for manufacturing related factors that could cause the blockage.During production, 100% final inspection is performed on the entire batch, including visual inspection and inner illumination.If a blockage would be noticed, the product would have been rejected immediately.Having said that, one may conclude that the blockage was formed after the product left the manufacturing plant.The root cause is inconclusive - unable to verify, since the blockage could have been caused by many different factors during and after the clinical procedure.The blockage does not seem to be product related since after cleaning the device the blockage was removed.(b)(4).
|