Device Problems
Migration or Expulsion of Device (1395); Patient-Device Incompatibility (2682)
|
Patient Problems
Erosion (1750); Pain (1994); Discomfort (2330); Patient Problem/Medical Problem (2688)
|
Event Date 06/21/2018 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The investigation is still in progress.Once the investigation is complete a supplemental report will be filed.The information provided by bard represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bard.The device was not returned.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the patient allegedly experienced vaginal pain, excessive soreness, and erosion, due to implantation of the mesh on (b)(6) 2012 at the gynecologic department at (b)(6) hospital.During examination it was found that the implanted mesh migrated centrally and in the space between the vaginal wall and column.On (b)(6) 2018 a surgical procedure was performed to remove the two arms of the mesh that were in the left side of the vagina.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The device was not returned for evaluation.The lot number is unknown; therefore, the device history record could not be reviewed.Although the product family is unknown, the women's health mesh product ifus are found to be adequate based on past reviews.Patient code: (b)(6).
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the patient experienced vaginal pain, excessive soreness and erosion, due to implantation of the mesh on (b)(6) 2012 at the gynecologic department at (b)(6) hospital.During examination it was found that the implanted mesh migrated centrally and in the space between the vaginal wall and column.On (b)(6) 2018 a surgical procedure was performed to removed the two arms of the mesh that were in the left side of the vagina.The patient status was unknown.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|