It was reported via journal article "title: a comparative analysis of different types of sling system for the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence" authors: zyaka asaf ogly dovlatov, alexander vasilyevich seregin, and oleg borisovich loran citation: rjpbcs.2015; 6(1): 1902.The objective of the study was to compare comparison of the long-term results of using different options sling systems for the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence (sui).The study included 698 women aged 42 to 68 years old with sui (bmi: 23.6 to 30.3).The authors used 4 types of sling: tvt in 167 women, gynecare tvt-o (ethicon) in 359 women, tvt-o in 105 women, and tvt-secur mini-sling system (ethicon) in 67 women.In the gynecare tvt-o group, reported complications included perforation of the bladder (n-3), perforation of the vagina (n-1), retropubic or perineal hematoma (n-3), wound infection (n-1), post-operative fever and urinary tract infection (n-6), hematuria (n-3), irritative and obstructive symptoms without acute urinary retention (n-5), acute urinary retention (n-2), presence of urinary incontinence (n-24), tape protrusion into the vagina (n-2), bladder outlet obstruction, which required tape dissection (n-2), recurrence of stress urinary incontinence (n-12), de novo imperative incontinence (n-4), de novo overactive bladder (n-4), dyspareunia (n-5), and chronic pelvic pain syndrome (n-3).In the tvt-secur mini sling system group, reported complications included perforation of the vagina (n-1), retropubic or perineal hematoma (n-1), post-operative fever and urinary tract infection (n-2), irritative and obstructive symptoms without acute urinary retention (n-1), presence of urinary incontinence (n-5), tape protrusion into the vagina (n-1), recurrence of stress urinary incontinence (n-2), de novo overactive bladder (n-1), dyspareunia (n-1), and chronic pelvic pain syndrome (n-1).The effectiveness of surgical treatment of stress urinary incontinence using the sling systems can achieve more than 90% irrespective of the type sling procedure.This efficacy of the treatment, as well as high safety and low morbidity are the main advantages of sling procedures prior to the classical approach to the surgical treatment of urinary incontinence.The study showed that compared sling techniques had no significant differences in objective and subjective criteria for the effectiveness of treatment.
|