The evaluation included a review of submitted data, product historical data, and product labeling.A review of complaint and trending data did not identify any issues or trends.The submitted data was reviewed and found that the initial closed-mode results generated on the cell-dyn ruby, matched the results generated on the alternate analyzer for all major parameters, including wbc, rbc, hgb, mcv, and plt.However, when the results from the repeat run in open mode on the cel-dyn ruby a difference was observed.The results were higher for rbc and hgb and lower for wbc and plt, which may be indicative that further mixing of the specimen was necessary.A review of the product labeling concluded that the issue is sufficiently addressed.No systemic issue or deficiency of the cell-dyn ruby analyzer was identified.
|