• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO. ENTERRA; INTESTINAL STIMULATOR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO. ENTERRA; INTESTINAL STIMULATOR Back to Search Results
Model Number 37800
Device Problems Therapy Delivered to Incorrect Body Area (1508); Inappropriate/Inadequate Shock/Stimulation (1574); Patient Device Interaction Problem (4001)
Patient Problems Nausea (1970); Undesired Nerve Stimulation (1980); Pain (1994); Vomiting (2144); Numbness (2415); Electric Shock (2554); Bronchospasm (2598)
Event Date 10/24/2018
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Information was received from a healthcare professional (hcp) via a manufacturer representative (rep) regarding a patient with an implantable neurostimulator (ins).It was reported the patient was experiencing positional stocking/stimulation in her lower right quadrant.The rep noted after the hcp turned the device down to normal setting she was feeling more about the stomach.The hcp was going to the patient on october 30th to see if she was any better.The rep noted there was no environmental, external, or patient factors that may have led or contributed to the issue.The rep noted the issue was not resolved at the time of the report.It was noted there was surgical intervention and there was no surgical intervention planned.The patient was reported to be alive with no injury at the time of the report.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Updated to serious injury.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Additional information was received from the healthcare professional (hcp) via the manufacture representative (rep) that reported the patient was doing much better.Additional information from the hcp via the rep (b)(4) reported the hcp planned on moving the battery within her current pocket above the incision line on (b)(4).Additional information from the hcp via the rep on (b)(4) reported the hcp revised the pocket on (b)(4) due to continued spasms.The patient was doing well in regard to elevating her nausea and vomiting symptoms.There were no further complications that have been reported as a result of this event.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Additional information from the manufacture representative (rep) reported the issue had resolved.There were no further complications that have been reported as a result of this event.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Patient codes (b)(4) also pertains to this event.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Additional information from the healthcare professional (hcp) reported they saw the patient on october 29th and they were still experiencing pain and spams.The hcp had turned off her device on october 24th in hopes it would elevate the issue, but it did not.The hcp noted that everything during the surgery went perfectly but the patient had spasms in the left upper quadrant and feeling like she had shock waves, first numbness down the left leg and then across the abdomen.The hcp noted the implantable neurostimulator (ins) was on normal setting during this.The hcp noted they turned it off and she continued to have it happen.The hcp noted the ct of the abdomen and pelvic looked perfect.The hcp questioned if they should turn it back on or wait a bit.The hcp questioned if it was due to the actual stimulator being close to the rectus muscle causing spams.The hcp noted they couldn't imagine the probs themselves doing it.The hcp noted both themselves and the rep were perplexed.The hcp noted the patient was on gabapentin, but it had not made much of a difference.There were no further complications that have been reported as a result of this event.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Product id: 4351-35, serial# (b)(4), implanted: (b)(6) 2018, product type: lead; product id: 4351-35, serial# (b)(4), implanted: (b)(6) 2018, product type: lead.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Additional information was received from the manufacturer representative (rep).They met with the patient and they stated they were no better since implant.The rep turned the device off to see if the patient¿s symptoms worsen.No further patient complications were reported as a result of this event.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ENTERRA
Type of Device
INTESTINAL STIMULATOR
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO.
road 31, km. 24, hm 4
ceiba norte industrial park
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO.
road 31, km. 24, hm 4
ceiba norte industrial park
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer Contact
lisa woodward clark
7000 central avenue ne rcw215
minneapolis, MN 55432
7635263920
MDR Report Key8010139
MDR Text Key125868667
Report Number3004209178-2018-24034
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LNQ
UDI-Device Identifier00643169614246
UDI-Public00643169614246
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
H990014
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 09/25/2019
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date08/14/2019
Device Model Number37800
Device Catalogue Number37800
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 10/24/2018
Initial Date FDA Received10/26/2018
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received10/29/2018
12/03/2018
12/03/2018
01/02/2019
09/10/2019
Supplement Dates FDA Received11/19/2018
12/03/2018
12/03/2018
01/08/2019
09/25/2019
Date Device Manufactured02/23/2018
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age25 YR
-
-