• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: DEPUY CMW - 9610921 SMARTSET HV BONE CEMENT 40G; BONE CEMENT : BONE CEMENT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

DEPUY CMW - 9610921 SMARTSET HV BONE CEMENT 40G; BONE CEMENT : BONE CEMENT Back to Search Results
Model Number 3092-040
Device Problems Loss of or Failure to Bond (1068); Loose or Intermittent Connection (1371)
Patient Problems Pain (1994); Ambulation Difficulties (2544); No Code Available (3191); Swelling/ Edema (4577)
Event Date 08/29/2018
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Product complaint #: (b)(4).If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Reporter is a non-healthcare professional.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
Right knee revised due to pain and loosening of tibial tray at the cement to implant interface.Doi: (b)(6) 2017; dor: (b)(6) 2018.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Investigation summary : no device associated with this report was received for examination.X-ray images were included for review.Depuy synthes considers the investigation closed at this time.Should additional information be received, the information will be reviewed and the investigation may be re-opened as necessary.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Product complaint # (b)(4).This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy synthes joint reconstruction, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, depuy synthes joint reconstruction, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.H6 impact code: removed code for surgical intervention and replaced with device revision or replacement (f1905).
 
Event Description
Primary operative notes (b)(6) 2017 indicated that the patient received left total knee replacement due to end stage osteoarthritis.The surgery was completed without indication of complication by the surgeon.Primary operative notes (b)(6) 2017 indicated that the patient received right total knee replacement due to end stage osteoarthritis.The surgery was completed without indication of complication by the surgeon.Revision operative notes (b)(6) 2018 indicated that the patient received a right total knee revision due to pain, swelling, clunking and inability to ambulate.The tibial component was noted to be loose at the cement to implant interface.The femoral component was also noted to be loose at the cement and implant interface and was revised.The surgery was completed without indication of complication by the surgeon.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Product complaint # (b)(4).This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy synthes joint reconstruction, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, depuy synthes joint reconstruction, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.H10 additional narrative: added: b5.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
 
Event Description
Medical records/billing records were reviewed: on (b)(6) 2018, the patient had a revision right total knee arthroplasty to address loosening tibial tray at the implant/cement interface, pain, effusion, clunking and inability to perform his normal function.The femoral component was noted to be loosened ¿was cleaned and re-cemented¿, the patella was noted to be well fixed and was retained.On (b)(6) 2018, the patient had a revision left total knee arthroplasty to address loosening of the tibial tray at the cement/implant interface, pain, swelling, and difficulty with walking.The patella and femoral components were noted to be well-fixed and were retained.The insert was removed without allegation of deficiency.(sticker page 46 of 97) depuy tibial tray and insert were used as well as competitor cement x2 were used during this procedure.On (b)(6) 2019, the patient had a revision right total knee arthroplasty to address loose right total knee.The indications for surgery included that the patient had a previous revision for aseptic loosening of his tibial plateau.The patient now has loosening of the femoral component as well as the patellar component, severe popping and snapping and difficult ambulation.During the procedure, the surgeon observed loosening of the femoral component and patella, with no interface provided.The tibial tray was noted to be well fixed.(sticker page 55 of 97) depuy patella, insert, and femoral components along with competitor cement x2 were used during this procedure.On (b)(6) 2019, the patient had a revision left total knee arthroplasty to address failed left total knee arthroplasty and loose left total knee arthroplasty.The indications for surgery included: one bag of depuy cement used for both knees during initial implantation, which led to early failure and has had a previous revision for loose tibial.Prior medical records noted the patient was experiencing instability, and pain.During the current revision the surgeon reported that the femoral component and patella were loose, no interface provided.(sticker page 43 of 97) depuy femoral component, patella, and insert, along with competitor cement x2 were used during this procedure.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Product complaint#: (b)(4).This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy synthes joint reconstruction, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, depuy synthes joint reconstruction, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
 
Event Description
Medical and billing records received and were reviewed: office notes on (b)(6) 2019, indicate the patient is experiencing swelling, popping, instability and pain of the left knee.He is also experiencing swelling, pain, numbness and instability in the right knee and feelings of crunching and cracking.Current treatment includes oral pain medication, physical therapy, knee braces and nerve blocks.No evidence of additional revision of products.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Product complaint # (b)(4).Investigation summary no device associated with this report was received for examination.X-ray images were included for review.Depuy synthes considers the investigation closed at this time.Should additional information be received, the information will be reviewed and the investigation may be re-opened as necessary.Per internal procedures, the event information and any investigational inputs received as part of required follow up were reviewed.For this investigation, no immediate action was required as no alleged deficiency with the device was identified.Monitor ¿ exempt per wi-7915 - known possible complication of joint replacement surgery no device associated with this report was received for examination.All available x-rays were reviewed, and no evidence of implant fracture, disassociation, or anything indicative of a device nonconformance was found.In order to determine if a lot related issue was possible, a worldwide complaint database search was performed.A worldwide complaint database search found an additional related report (b)(4) involving the patient's left knee against the provided product code/lot code combination.Both knees were revised the same day.Based on the inability to find any additional related reports against the provided product code/lot code combination it is reasonable to conclude that there are no anomalies with regard to manufacturing or inspection contained in the device history records that would contribute to the reported event.Medical records were provided and reviewed by a medical professional.From a medical perspective, based on the limited information available, it is not possible to determine if the complaint is product related.See attached medical record review for further information.The reported event is considered one of the possible complications of joint replacement.Investigational inputs were requested as indicated per internal procedures for this failure mode.The complaint information provided has been reviewed for complaint coding, medical device reporting, and other data required by the complaint system.Any follow-up for additional event information will be conducted by the legal group.- without the physical complaint sample associated with this report, it was not possible to determine if the device failed to meet specification at the time it was released for distribution.- the device associated with this event was used in the treatment of the patient as prescribed by the presiding surgeon.- from the event information received, it was not possible to determine the relationship of the device to the reported event.No product contribution to the reported event was identified.No information received with this individual complaint indicated that a broader investigation or corrective action was necessary.Depuy synthes considers the investigation closed at this time.Should additional information be received, the information will be reviewed and the investigation may be re-opened as necessary.Device history lot the product investigation found no evidence suspecting an error in the manufacturing or material that would be a contributing factor in the reported allegation(s).A manufacturing records evaluation (mre) was not performed.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SMARTSET HV BONE CEMENT 40G
Type of Device
BONE CEMENT : BONE CEMENT
Manufacturer (Section D)
DEPUY CMW - 9610921
cornford rd
blackpool IN FY4 4 QQ
UK  FY4 4QQ
Manufacturer (Section G)
DEPUY CMW- 9610921
cornford rd.
blackpool FY4 4 QQ
UK   FY4 4QQ
Manufacturer Contact
kara ditty-bovard
700 orthopaedic drive
warsaw, IN 46582-0988
6107428552
MDR Report Key8029367
MDR Text Key125834780
Report Number1818910-2018-74224
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LOD
UDI-Device Identifier10603295168331
UDI-Public10603295168331
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K023012
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Consumer
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 10/02/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date02/28/2019
Device Model Number3092-040
Device Catalogue Number3092040
Device Lot Number8484058
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 10/02/2018
Initial Date FDA Received11/01/2018
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received11/19/2018
12/16/2020
03/17/2021
03/31/2021
03/24/2022
Supplement Dates FDA Received11/20/2018
12/22/2020
04/06/2021
04/26/2021
04/01/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured04/21/2017
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
MBT CEM KEEL TIB TRAY SZ5.; PFC SIGMARP STB TB IN 5 10.0.; PFC*SIGMA/OV/DOME PAT 3PEG,41.; SIGMA PS CEM FEM SZ5 R.; SMARTSET HV BONE CEMENT 40G.
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age62 YR
Patient SexMale
Patient Weight109 KG
-
-