A visual inspection of the returned rod (b)(4) revealed it was partially distracted with score marks on the distraction rod.X-ray images of the internal components showed no damage.The rod was functionally tested and was unable to distract and retract with the manual distractor.However, the rod was able to distract and retract with an erc.The total stroke measurement, and distraction force testing met specification.A visual inspection of the second rod (b)(4) revealed it was partially distracted.The rod was functionally tested and could not be distracted or retracted using the manual distractor or erc.The rod was cut open and debris build up was found, which may have caused the reduced functionality of the rod.A review of the lot history records for the devices revealed that they met all of the required quality inspections and that the products were released within specifications.
|