Model Number M0061603300 |
Device Problem
Migration (4003)
|
Patient Problem
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
Event Date 10/11/2018 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Problem code captures the reportable event of stent migration. the device has not been received for analysis.Upon receipt and completion of the failure analysis of the complaint device, if there is any further relevant information from that review, a supplemental medwatch will be filed.
|
|
Event Description
|
Sit was reported to boston scientific corporation that a percuflex stent was implanted in a patient on an unknown date.According to the complainant, the patient came back to the hospital for reasons unknown and it was discovered that the stent had migrated it was reported that the stent may have migrated due to the stent length being incorrect.A second percuflex stent was then implanted in the patient.There was no serious injury nor were there any adverse patient effects reported as a result of this event.The patient was reported to in stable condition post procedure.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Problem code 4003 captures the reportable event of stent migration.Investigation results: a urinary diversion stent was returned for analysis.A visual evaluation of the returned device revealed that it was returned with the catheter connector.The red connector was disassembled and the grommet was noticed to be missing.It was not returned with the device.No other defects were noted.A functional evaluation was performed and the urinary diversion stent was introduced inside the connector (red) and the stent passed properly.The connector was screwed to the stent and failed the functional test due to the missing grommet; consequently confirming the event of the stent being disconnected and migrating.Based on event analysis, it is most likely that during unpacking, preparation or during the procedure, when the red connector was disassembled, the grommet became lost.Therefore, adverse event related to procedure is selected as the most probable root cause for the complaint.A review of the device history record (dhr) was performed and confirmed that this device met all material, assembly and performance specifications at the time of release for distribution.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported to boston scientific corporation that a percuflex stent was implanted in a patient on an unknown date.According to the complainant, the patient came back to the hospital for reasons unknown and it was discovered that the stent had migrated.It was reported that the stent may have migrated due to the stent length being incorrect.A second percuflex stent was then implanted in the patient.There was no serious injury nor were there any adverse patient effects reported as a result of this event.The patient was reported to in stable condition post procedure.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|