It was reported an ultrathane cope nephroureterectomy stent was placed in a patient during the "summer" of 2018.An unspecified amount of time after placement, the catheter was found to be leaking at the connection between the catheter and the hub.It is unknown if the catheter was replaced.Additional information regarding the event, patient demographics, and patient outcome has been requested but is currently unavailable.
|
It was reported an ultrathane cope nephroureterostomy stent was placed in the patient's kidney for urine drainage.Nine days later, the drain was exchanged due to leakage at the hub.This event is recorded under this medwatch report #1820334-2018-03338.The next day, the replacement drain was found to be leaking and was exchanged again for a new drain of the same type.This event is recorded under this medwatch report (1820334-2018-03340).As reported, the patient did not experience any other adverse effects due to this occurrence.Patient code: 3191 [no code available]- additional procedure required to replace device this report includes information known at this time.A follow up report will be submitted should additional relevant information become available.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803.This report is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement made in it is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned; that a death or serious injury occurred; or that any cook device caused or contributed to; or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|
D10 - device available for evaluation: no.Investigation ¿ evaluation.A review of the complaint history, device history record, documentation, drawing, instructions for use (ifu), manufacturing instructions, quality control, and specifications of the device, as well as a review of devices returned from the same lot, was conducted during the investigation.The complaint device was not returned; therefore, no physical examinations could be performed.However, a document based investigation evaluation was performed.There is no evidence to suggest the product was not made to specifications.A review of the device history record shows one nonconforming event which could contribute to this failure mode; however, all of the returned devices for this lot were measured within specifications, so there is no evidence of non-conforming devices in the field.It should be noted there were three other reported complaints for this lot number.Based on the information provided, the examination of related returned product, and the results of our investigation, a definitive root cause could not be established.Measures are being conducted to address this failure mode.Cook will continue to monitor for similar complaints.Per the quality engineering risk assessment no further action is required.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|