Catalog Number AI-06210 |
Device Problem
Failure to Capture (1081)
|
Patient Problem
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
Event Date 10/25/2018 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the patient was in need of electrical support with a transvenous pacemaker, change was made from introducer number 7.5 fr and external electrode 6 fr, due to its difficult advance capture, it is evident that this dysfunction in the distal end of the negative pole.As a result, the electrode was changed by connecting the patient to the defibrillator to place it in transcutaneous pacemaker mode while removing the dysfunctional transvenous electrode and advancing a new one through the same introducer.Possible failure in the connection of the distal end of the negative pole.The shift doctor performed a test peeling of the cable at the most proximal point and achieved reading but, this connection was unstable, so the device is changed.There was no patient death or serious injury reported.Patient current outcome reported as fine.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the patient was in need of electrical support with a transvenous pacemaker, change was made from introducer number 7.5 fr and external electrode 6 fr, due to its difficult advance capture, it is evident that this dysfunction in the distal end of the negative pole.As a result, the electrode was changed by connecting the patient to the defibrillator to place it in transcutaneous pacemaker mode while removing the dysfunctional transvenous electrode and advancing a new one through the same introducer.Possible failure in the connection of the distal end of the negative pole.The shift doctor performed a test peeling of the cable at the most proximal point and achieved reading but, this connection was unstable, so the device is changed.There was no patient death or serious injury reported.Patient current outcome reported as fine.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).The reported complaint of pacing catheter low/no signal is not confirmed.During functional testing, both the distal and proximal electrodes met product specifications.Although, the root cause of the complaint is undetermined the returned device passed functional test specifications.No further action required at this time.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|