• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: LIVANOVA USA, INC. BIPOL LEAD MODEL 300

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

LIVANOVA USA, INC. BIPOL LEAD MODEL 300 Back to Search Results
Model Number 300-20
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Unspecified Infection (1930); Impaired Healing (2378); Tissue Breakdown (2681); Fluid Discharge (2686); No Information (3190)
Event Date 10/31/2018
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
It was reported by the patient that his chest incision site was not healing well.Further information was received from the surgeon's office that the generator has started to erode out of the skin.Surgery has been scheduled for the end of the month and it is stated that no product replacement is anticipated.Follow up with the physician clarified that the extrusion was of the lead at the chest incision site.The physician did not know the cause of the impaired healing or extrusion.He stated that the site had initially healed from the implant surgery, and then further speculated that the extrusion could be related to a small generator pocket size or migration and inadequate anchoring.No further relevant information was received to date.
 
Event Description
An update was received indicating that the patient's infection has now "erupted" above the generator site, not at the incision site.The physician was planning to remove the lead and generator.It was confirmed that the patient's generator and lead were explanted.Plans to reimplant the vns would wait until the infection was cleared and fully healed.No additional, relevant information was received to date.
 
Event Description
The patient underwent a generator repositioning surgery.Pre-operative diagnostics indicated that the device was performing as intended.During the surgery, it was noted that the generator was positioned in a way where the lead that was coming out of the generator went "straight up and made a sharp 'u'-shaped bend straight back down".This bend wore through some of the incision site and was partially exposed.The surgeon removed some tissue around the exposed area and expanded the pocket for better fit of the generator.It was noted during the surgery that just below one of the lead pins, scar tissue had formed in the shape of a tube around the pin's wire.It was stated that within the tube, the lead wire had a portion that was exposed with the insulation pulled back.This abraded opening was reported in mfg report #1644487-2018-02373.Diagnostics were performed outside the pocket noting impedance within normal limits.The generator was then positioned and secured into the pocket.Another diagnostic was performed with ok impedance and the pocket was closed.No additional relevant information was received to date.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Patient codes, corrected data: follow-up report #2 inadvertently left out coding to capture unspecified adverse event.
 
Event Description
Clinic notes were received as part of the surgery referral process, and follow-up indicated that the reason for surgical referral was due to the patient having an infection.It was noted that the patient had a surgery on 01/04/2019 for the vns and the generator was repositioned.He then began seeing some swelling at the surgical site and reported that the wound was aspirated and was given antibiotics.Around 01/15/2019, the wound began to drain; the patient had kept it clean and put patches over the wound, but yellowish fluid was secreting out.The patient was therefore referred for surgery, stated to be for replacement.Device diagnostics were 1197ohms, and no setting changes were made as there is drainage from the surgical site.An update was then received stating that the physician was not willing to explant vns at this time, and that the patient currently remains on antibiotics.Device history records were reviewed for the implanted generator and confirmed that the device was sterilized prior to distribution.No known replacement or explant surgery has occurred to date.No additional, relevant information was received to date.
 
Event Description
Images were received of sores excreting red fluid.The location of the sore could not be confirmed from the images.The patient previously had sores as well, which were attributed to keppra), and after the recent repositioning surgery, the patient stated that the sores had not gone away and believed they were caused by vns.Clinic notes were received indicating that the patient had some swelling at the surgical site and reported that the wound was aspirated and antibiotics were started.About two weeks later, the wound started to drain with yellow-ish fluid.The physician planned to have the device explanted and then reimplanted at a later date.No known additional surgery has occurred to date.No additional, relevant information was received to date.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
BIPOL LEAD MODEL 300
Type of Device
LEAD
Manufacturer (Section D)
LIVANOVA USA, INC.
100 cyberonics blvd
houston TX 77058
Manufacturer (Section G)
LIVANOVA USA, INC.
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston TX 77058
Manufacturer Contact
rachel kohn
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston, TX 77058
2812287200
MDR Report Key8095325
MDR Text Key128062983
Report Number1644487-2018-02130
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LYJ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P970003
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,consum
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 04/16/2019
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date10/18/2001
Device Model Number300-20
Device Lot Number30151C
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Event Location Other
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 10/31/2018
Initial Date FDA Received11/21/2018
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received11/29/2018
01/23/2019
02/13/2019
03/29/2019
Supplement Dates FDA Received12/20/2018
02/14/2019
03/11/2019
04/16/2019
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured10/18/1999
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
Patient Age67 YR
-
-