Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.(b)(4).Expiration date= na.Lot number = (10)1158d.A review of the device history records and device evaluation has been requested.Product was returned for investigation for a broken cutter.Upon visual evaluation of the returned device, it was noted that the metal cutter was completely separated from the insert assembly.It is unknown how the product was being used at the time.Additional evaluation is pending from manufacturing site.This is one of two medwatches being submitted as two devices were involved in this event.See medwatch 8041101-2018-00031.The same patient is represented in each medwatch.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.A manufacturing investigation was performed for the subject device, it was confirmed that the metal cutter was completely separated from the insert assembly.It is unknown how the product was being used at the time.At this time, no conclusion is able to be drawn about the cause of the metal cutter separation as no additional information is available regarding the use of the device.Device history records review was completed.No non conformance reports were generated during production.Review of the device history records showed that there were no issues during the manufacture of the product that would contribute to this complaint condition and product was manufactured per specification.The product was manufactured on april 25, 2018.This is one of two follow-up medwatches being submitted as two devices were involved in this event.See medwatch 8041101-2018-00031.The same patient is represented in each medwatch.If information is obtained that was not available for this follow-up medwatch, an additional follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|