• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ORTHO-CLINICAL DIAGNOSTICS VITROS IMMUNODIAGNOSTIC PRODUCTS PSA REAGENT PACK; IN VITRO DIAGNOSTICS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ORTHO-CLINICAL DIAGNOSTICS VITROS IMMUNODIAGNOSTIC PRODUCTS PSA REAGENT PACK; IN VITRO DIAGNOSTICS Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 6801756
Device Problem Low Test Results (2458)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 11/01/2018
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
The investigation determined that lower than expected vitros psa results were attained from two different patient samples using vitros immunodiagnostics products psa (psa) reagent in combination with a vitros 5600 integrated system.The results were lower then expected when compared to the results obtained from the same samples freshly drawn.A definitive assignable cause for the low results could not be determined.Based on historical quality control results, a vitros psa lot 3620 and 3640 performance issue is not a likely contributor to the event.Continual tracking and trending of complaints has not shown any existing signals that would point to a potential systemic issue with vitros immunodiagnostics products psa (psa) reagent lot 3620 or 3640.In addition, there is no indication of an instrument malfunction.However, a within run precision test was not run at the time of the event and therefore, an instrument issue cannot be definitively ruled out.Furthermore, pre-analytical sample processing cannot be ruled out as a contributing factor, as it was not possible to establish if the customer was following the sample collection device manufacturer¿s recommendation for sample centrifugation.It is possible that cellular debris, due to poor sample preparation, was present in the affected samples, although this could not be confirmed.Additionally, when samples are tested concurrently, reproducible results are obtained for both fresh and stored samples using both reagent lots.Only when fresh samples are compared to stored samples are biased results observed.Consequently, sample preparation and the handling and storage of the samples cannot be ruled out as a contributing factor to the event.
 
Event Description
A customer reported lower than expected patient sample results attained using vitros immunodiagnostics products psa (psa) reagent on a vitros 5600 integrated system.Patient sample 1 results of 29.5 and 28.3 ng/ml versus the expected result of 53.3 ng/ml.Patient sample 3 result of 2.27 ng/ml versus the expected result of 3.11 ng/ml.Biased results of the magnitude and direction observed may lead to inappropriate physician action if they were to occur undetected on patient samples.The lower than expected vitros psa results were not reported from the laboratory.There have been no allegations of patient harm as a result of this event.This report is number 1 of 2 mdr¿s for this event.Two (2) 3500a forms are being submitted for this event as 2 devices were involved.(b)(4).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
VITROS IMMUNODIAGNOSTIC PRODUCTS PSA REAGENT PACK
Type of Device
IN VITRO DIAGNOSTICS
Manufacturer (Section D)
ORTHO-CLINICAL DIAGNOSTICS
100 indigo creek drive
rochester NY 14626
Manufacturer (Section G)
ORTHO CLINICAL DIAGNOSTICS
felindre meadows
pencoed
bridgend, wales CF35 5PZ
UK   CF35 5PZ
Manufacturer Contact
james a stevens
100 indigo creek drive
rochester, NY 14626
5854533000
MDR Report Key8115468
MDR Text Key129581995
Report Number3007111389-2018-00183
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LTJ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type health professional
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 11/29/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date02/06/2019
Device Catalogue Number6801756
Device Lot Number3640
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 11/02/2018
Initial Date FDA Received11/29/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured07/30/2018
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage N
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-