Model Number VTICMO12.6 |
Device Problems
Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size (1583); Device Markings/Labelling Problem (2911)
|
Patient Problems
No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692); No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
This product is not marketed in the us.One similar complaint type event was reported for units within the same lot.(b)(4).
|
|
Event Description
|
The reporter indicated that a vticmo 12.6 -12.00/+1.50/082, serial (b)(4), implantable collamer lens was implanted into the patients left eye (os).The reporter states that the same model, power and serial number of this lens (vticmo 12.6 -12.00/+1.50/082, serial # (b)(4) was shown on the patient chart label inside the box for another lens with vticmo 12.6 -12.00/+1.50/083, serial # (b)(4) indicated on the external box label.The lens remains implanted and it was reported that there is no negative feedback or complaints about the patient's condition.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
B5: the reporter stated that the serial # (b)(6) (vticmo 12.6 -12.00/+1.50/082) was shown on the patient chart label inside the box for another lens with serial# (b)(6) (vticmo 12.6 -12.00/+1.50/083) indicated on the external box label.Reportedly, "the lens was not implanted in 2018 due to patient's reasons." the vticmo 12.6 lens with a diopter of -12.00/+1.50/082 (sphere/cylinder/axis), serial (b)(6) was implanted to the patient's left eye (os) on (b)(6) 2020.The lens was exchanged on (b)(6) 2020 for a longer length lens due to low vaulting.The problem was resolved.Claim#: (b)(4).
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
H3 device evaluation: the lens was returned in liquid in a microcentrifuge vial.Visual inspection found no visible damage to lens.Complaint descriptions package label does not match serial number on sticker.Unable to verify complaint statement due to lens not returned in original packaging.Claim #(b)(4).
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
H6 - type of investigation 3331 - device history record (dhr) review: based on the results of the investigation, the probable cause of the failure is likely due to failure to follow procedure by packaging more than one lens at a time and therefore inadvertently packaging the incorrect patient chart label.A second probable cause identified is due to inadequate final verification process of the patient chart label.Corrective actions for a similar discrepancy regarding the packaging of an incorrect patient chart label have been identified and have been implemented under capa m18-12.Claim #(b)(4).
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|