It was reported by a newly implanted patient that she was experiencing pain in her chest that would feel like it was radiating from her clavicle to her sternum, through her left breast, armpit and down her left arm, leaving her middle 3 fingers "tingly".The patient was told during her follow up appointment that she was experiencing "frozen shoulder" and was given exercises to resolve the issue.Upon follow up with another physician, it was noted that her anatomy may have caused a nerve to be compressed.The patient stated that her generator was placed in the crease of her armpit.A ct scan was performed to "check the nerves", and the physician also noted possibly performing a "tunneled revision" in order to reposition the device.In a separate call, it was reported by the patient that she eventually lost mobility in her left arm and also suspected that the device had migrated.It was stated that results of the scan were still pending, and it was clarified that the pain was constant and persisted even when inhibiting stimulation with the magnet.The patient further reported a rash on her chest around the generator site that was being treated with an antibiotic.The patient stated that she was meeting with the surgeon to discuss emg results on her left arm: if the results were fine, the surgeon suggested device explant.The surgeon had also stated he could implant the device on the right side, but did not want the same thing to be occurring for both sides.The patient expressed frustration as she felt the physician was "blaming" her anatomy and did not want the device removed as she fought to have the device implanted for a better quality of life.A further update noted that the patient was to have a repositioning surgery before the end of the year to move the device just below her clavicle.Follow up with the physician seeing the patient confirmed that there was no migration and that a surgery (repositioning surgery) would be occurring for patient comfort, and not to preclude a serious injury.The surgeon did not known the cause of the patient's pain, immobility, and tingling sensation and noted that it could be related to a "cutaneous nerve irritation".The cause of the rash was also unknown.The rash was confirmed to have been resolved, and intervention taken was indicated to be for patient comfort and not to preclude a serious injury per the physician's response.No surgery has occurred to date.No additional relevant information was received to date.
|