|
Device Problem
Insufficient Information (3190)
|
Patient Problems
Burn, Thermal (2530); Partial thickness (Second Degree) Burn (2694)
|
Event Date 12/01/2018 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Event Description
|
Event verbatim [preferred term] massive burn blister / blisters over the area of the neck [burns second degree].Case narrative: this is a spontaneous report from a contactable pharmacist.A female patient of an unspecified age started to receive thermacare heatwrap (thermacare neck, shoulder & wrist), from an unspecified date at unknown frequency for an unspecified indication.The patient medical history and concomitant medications were not reported.The pharmacist reported very bad and strong reaction for the patient who bought the product.In (b)(6) 2018 the patient suffered from burn blister.The burn blisters were massive.After using it she had blisters over the area of the neck.The pharmacist was asking for information which they can provide to the patient in order to relax the situation.He said that if the patient didn't receive some information on this she may refer to a law suit.The action taken in response to the event for thermacare heatwrap was unknown.The outcome of the event was unknown.Additional information has been requested and will be provided as it becomes available.Company clinical evaluation comment: based on the information provided, the event of burns second degree as described is considered serious bodily injury potentially requiring medical intervention to prevent permanent damage or impairment of body structure.The event is medically assessed as associated with the use of the device., comment: based on the information provided, the event of burns second degree as described is considered serious bodily injury potentially requiring medical intervention to prevent permanent damage or impairment of body structure.The event is medically assessed as associated with the use of the device.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
There is no impact since a trend for the subclass adverse event was not identified.The root cause category is non-assignable (complaint not confirmed).The product effect may vary with each individual.Our manufacturing operations employ quality control procedures which include in-process testing, thermal testing and visual inspection, to ensure the quality of the product being packaged.
|
|
Event Description
|
Massive burn blister/blisters over the area of the neck/severe burns blisters up to the flesh open [burns second degree].Case narrative:this is a spontaneous report from a contactable pharmacist.A 60-year-old female patient started to receive thermacare heatwrap (thermacare neck, shoulder & wrist), from an unspecified date to an unspecified date at unknown frequency for an unspecified indication.The patient medical history included rheumatoid arthritis.There were no concomitant medications.The pharmacist reported very bad and strong reaction for the patient who bought the product.In dec2018 the patient suffered from burn blister.The burn blisters were massive.After using it she had blisters over the area of the neck.The pharmacist was asking for information which they can provide to the patient in order to relax the situation.He said that if the patient didn't receive some information on this she may refer to a law suit.The pharmacist further reported that the event had been described as severe burns blisters up to the flesh open which occurred for the first time.Surgery or another type of treatment was not required.The pharmacist suspected that the patient will have scars due to the event.The action taken in response to the event for thermacare heatwrap was permanently withdrawn.The outcome of the event was not resolved.Causality had been assessed as related by the pharmacist.According to product quality complaint group: there is no impact since a trend for the subclass adverse event was not identified.The root cause category is non-assignable (complaint not confirmed).The product effect may vary with each individual.Our manufacturing operations employ quality control procedures which include in-process testing, thermal testing and visual inspection, to ensure the quality of the product being packaged.Follow-up (14jan2019): new information received from the same contactable pharmacist includes: patient data (age, weight and height), medical history, concomitant drug data, suspect device data (action taken), outcome of event, event details and causality assessment.Follow-up attempts completed.No further information expected.Follow-up (23jan2019): new information received from product quality complaint group included: investigational results.Company clinical evaluation comment: based on the information provided, the event of burns second degree as described is considered serious bodily injury potentially requiring medical intervention to prevent permanent damage or impairment of body structure.The event is medically assessed as associated with the use of the device.There was limited device specific information provided, no batch number or return sample was available for evaluation.Without a batch reference number and/or return sample a manufacturing and technical evaluation cannot be completed for the wrap involved in this case.Product effect varies with each individual.No remedial action/corrective action/field safety corrective action is suggested at this time., comment: based on the information provided, the event of burns second degree as described is considered serious bodily injury potentially requiring medical intervention to prevent permanent damage or impairment of body structure.The event is medically assessed as associated with the use of the device.There was limited device specific information provided, no batch number or return sample was available for evaluation.Without a batch reference number and/or return sample a manufacturing and technical evaluation cannot be completed for the wrap involved in this case.Product effect varies with each individual.No remedial action/corrective action/field safety corrective action is suggested at this time.
|
|
Event Description
|
Event verbatim [preferred term] massive burn blister/blisters over the area of the neck/severe burns blisters up to the flesh open [burns second degree] ,.Case narrative:this is a spontaneous report from a contactable pharmacist.A 60-year-old female patient started to receive thermacare heatwrap (thermacare neck, shoulder & wrist), from an unspecified date to an unspecified date at unknown frequency for an unspecified indication.The patient medical history included rheumatoid arthritis.There were no concomitant medications.The pharmacist reported very bad and strong reaction for the patient who bought the product.In dec2018 the patient suffered from burn blister.The burn blisters were massive.After using it she had blisters over the area of the neck.The pharmacist was asking for information which they can provide to the patient in order to relax the situation.He said that if the patient didn't receive some information on this she may refer to a law suit.The pharmacist further reported that the event had been described as severe burns blisters up to the flesh open which occurred for the first time.Surgery or another type of treatment was not required.The pharmacist suspected that the patient will have scars due to the event.The action taken in response to the event for thermacare heatwrap was permanently withdrawn.The outcome of the event was not resolved.Causality had been assessed as related by the pharmacist.Follow-up (14jan2019): new information received from the same contactable pharmacist includes: patient data (age, weight and height), medical history, concomitant drug data, suspect device data (action taken), outcome of event, event details and causality assessment.Follow-up attempts completed.No further information expected.Company clinical evaluation comment: based on the information provided, the event of burns second degree as described is considered serious bodily injury potentially requiring medical intervention to prevent permanent damage or impairment of body structure.The event is medically assessed as associated with the use of the device., comment: based on the information provided, the event of burns second degree as described is considered serious bodily injury potentially requiring medical intervention to prevent permanent damage or impairment of body structure.The event is medically assessed as associated with the use of the device.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|