As the lot number for the device was not provided, a manufacturing review could not be performed.The sample was not returned to the manufacturer for inspection/evaluation.Therefore, the investigation of the reported event is inconclusive.Based upon the available information, the definitive root cause for this event is unknown.The instructions for use (ifu) is adequate for the reported device/patient code(s) and provides general instructions for use, as well as warnings, precautions and potential complications associated with the device.Upon receipt of new or additional information, a follow-up report will be submitted as applicable.Journal article review: a 70-year-old diabetic man was seen for non-healing toe amputation sites on the right foot.He had undergone two previous revascularizations in each lower extremity and had no veins remaining for use as a bypass.The patient underwent a right femoral-perineal bypass with a 6 mm thin-walled ringed impra eptfe graft.During the preparation of the eptfe graft the external beading was gradually removed parallel to the axis of the graft.Approximately 20% of the beading was removed when it sheared through the graft.The remaining length of the eptfe was enough for the femoral-perineal bypass and was completed without incident.The remainder of the procedure was uneventful and the patient did well postoperatively.Patient was discharged five days post-operative procedure.Friedman, s.(2002).Fracture of an impra eptfe graft caused by removal of the beading.Ejves extra, 3(1), 6-7.Doi:10.1053/ejvx.2002.0112.
|