The exact age of the patient is unknown.However, it was reported the patient was over 18 years.(b)(4).An rx cytology brush was returned for evaluation.A visual evaluation found the working length (extrusion and wire) is kinked in several locations, also the distal section of the device (brush section) is bent.Analysis of the returned device revealed that the brush extension and retraction were measured and both dimensions were found to be within specifications.During the functional inspection the brush was able to extend and retract, however, there was resistance due to the working length (extrusion and wire) being kinked in several locations.In addition, the distal section of the device (brush section) was bent which could have cause some difficulty at the moment to extend/retract the brush.The damages noted with the returned device were most likely that handling and manipulation of the device could have contributed with the encountered damages.Likely the failures found (working length (extrusion and wire) kinked and brush section bent) were caused due to excessive manipulation as the customer tested the device during preparation.Handling and manipulation of the device can lead to kink the extrusion and wire, this condition can cause difficulties to extend/retract the brush due to friction generated between extrusion and wire at kinked/bent areas.Based on the information available and the analysis performed, the most probable root cause classification is cause traced to component failure.A review of the device history record (dhr) was performed and confirmed that this device met all material, assembly and performance specifications.
|
It was reported to boston scientific corporation that a rx cytology brush wireguided was to be used in the distal bile duct for a brush cytology procedure for diagnosis of suspected pancreatic cancer performed on (b)(6) 2018.According to the complainant, during preparation and outside the patient, the brush could not be retracted.The procedure was completed with another cytology brush.There was no serious injury nor any adverse patient effects reported as a result of this event.Note: this event has been deemed an mdr-reportable event based on the investigation results which revealed that the distal section of the device (brush section) was bent.
|