• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ETHICON INC. TENSION FREE VAGINAL TAPE UNKNOWN PRODUCT; MESH, SURGICAL, SYNTHETIC, UROGYNECOLOGICAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ETHICON INC. TENSION FREE VAGINAL TAPE UNKNOWN PRODUCT; MESH, SURGICAL, SYNTHETIC, UROGYNECOLOGICAL Back to Search Results
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Neurological Deficit/Dysfunction (1982); Urinary Tract Infection (2120); Injury (2348)
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).This report is related to a journal article; therefore, no product will be returned for analysis and the batch history records cannot be reviewed as the lot number has not been provided.Attempts are being made to obtain the following information.To date no response has been provided.If further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.Were the cases discussed in this article previously reported to ethicon? if yes, please provide a complaint reference number.Does the surgeon believe that ethicon products (tvt) involved caused and/or contributed to the post-operative complications described in the article? does the surgeon believe there was any deficiency with the ethicon products (tvt) used in this procedure? citation: open journal of obstetrics and gynecology.2014; 4: 169-175.Doi: http://dx.Doi.Org/10.4236/ojog.2014.43028.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
It was reported via journal article: title: "treatment success of transobturator tape compared with tension free vaginal tape for stress urinary incontinence at 24 months: a randomized controlled trial." authors: mahmoud fathy hassan, osama el-tohamy, mostafa kamel.Citation: open journal of obstetrics and gynecology.2014; 4: 169-175.Doi: http://dx.Doi.Org/10.4236/ojog.2014.43028.The objectives of the study was to compare the long term efficacy of transobturator tape (tot) with tension free vaginal tape (tvt) at 24 months postoperatively.A total of 160 women with stress urinary incontinence (sui) were randomly allocated to either tvt (n-80; age: 53.1 ± 8.1; bmi: 29.9 ± 5.5) or tot (n-80; age: 51.6 ± 7.9; bmi: 30.4 ± 4.9) procedures and reviewed at 24 months after surgery.The tvt procedure was performed using the ¿bottom up¿ approach following the technique described by the manufacturer using gynecare tvt (ethicon).In the tvt group, reported complications included urinary tract infection (n-10), voiding dysfunction (n-8), and bladder perforation (n-3).It was concluded that there were no significant differences in objective and subjective outcomes between women who had tot or tvt procedures at 24 months follow up.Both procedures had similar complication rate.However, tot procedure had a shorter operating time.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TENSION FREE VAGINAL TAPE UNKNOWN PRODUCT
Type of Device
MESH, SURGICAL, SYNTHETIC, UROGYNECOLOGICAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
ETHICON INC.
p.o. box 151, route 22 west
somerville NJ 08876 0151
Manufacturer (Section G)
ETHICON SARL-NEUCHATEL
puits-godet 20
neuchatel
SZ  
Manufacturer Contact
darlene kyle
p.o. box 151, route 22 west
somerville, NJ 08876-0151
9082182792
MDR Report Key8209484
MDR Text Key131829786
Report Number2210968-2019-78111
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code OTN
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeEG
PMA/PMN Number
K974098
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type foreign,literature
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 12/12/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 12/12/2018
Initial Date FDA Received01/02/2019
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-