• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: TORAX MEDICAL, INC. LINX 1.5 16 BEAD US; ANTI-REFLUX IMPLANT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

TORAX MEDICAL, INC. LINX 1.5 16 BEAD US; ANTI-REFLUX IMPLANT Back to Search Results
Catalog Number LXMC16
Device Problem Material Erosion (1214)
Patient Problems Erosion (1750); Not Applicable (3189); No Code Available (3191)
Event Date 12/10/2018
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Additional information was requested, and the following was obtained: i do not have much information on the patient.I was told by another physician that the linx was implanted at the same time as revision of gastric bypass.I have answered as many question as possible below.What were the first clinical symptoms that provided evidence of an erosion and when did they first occur? na.Has the patient had any dilations, egd, or other procedure between the linx implant and discovery of the erosion? please describe and include the dates of the procedures.There has been egd¿s- i do not know how many or dates of the procedures.Are pictures or videos available? no.How many beads eroded? looked to be 2.Where were the eroded beads positioned? patients right side of the esophagus.Which best describes the device removal approach? laparoscopically.Endoscopically removed the eroded beads initially & laparoscopically removed the device at a later date- no.Endoscopically removed the eroded beads & laparoscopically removed the device the same day- no.Endoscopically removed the entire device- no.Laparoscopically removed the entire device- yes.Was the patient stented? not at the this time.What is the current condition of the patient? as of yesterday- the patient was still in the hospital.Attempts are being made to obtain the following information.To date no response has been provided.If further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.What were the first clinical symptoms that provided evidence of an erosion and when did they first occur? has the patient had any dilations, egd, or other procedure between the linx implant and discovery of the erosion? please describe and include the dates of the procedures.How many beads eroded? what is the current condition of the patient?.
 
Event Description
It was reported post implant of linx device, the device was eroded into the esophagus.Unknown how the issue was diagnosed.A whole host was used; xray and endoscope.Explant; patient will be in the hospital for four or five days following surgery and possibly stented depending on how it heals.Any next steps required? no.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Date sent: 02/20/2019.Device analysis: overall review of the device function and dimensions show no anomalies from a device that has been reasonably changed as part of the explant procedure.Visual analysis was consistent with an explanted device, and link length and tensile force were found to meet the applicable specifications.Overall, no analysis conclusions relevant to the patient experience were found.The device lot number is unknown; therefore, the device history record could not be reviewed.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
LINX 1.5 16 BEAD US
Type of Device
ANTI-REFLUX IMPLANT
Manufacturer (Section D)
TORAX MEDICAL, INC.
4188 lexington avenue north
shoreview MN
MDR Report Key8220425
MDR Text Key132201505
Report Number3008766073-2019-00230
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LEI
UDI-Device Identifier00855106005363
UDI-Public00855106005363
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
P100049
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 12/10/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberLXMC16
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Date Returned to Manufacturer12/26/2018
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 12/10/2018
Initial Date FDA Received01/04/2019
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received02/14/2019
Supplement Dates FDA Received02/20/2019
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-