• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: WAVELIGHT GMBH WAVELIGHT FS200 FEMTOSECOND LASER; POWERED LASER SURGICAL INSTRUMENT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

WAVELIGHT GMBH WAVELIGHT FS200 FEMTOSECOND LASER; POWERED LASER SURGICAL INSTRUMENT Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 8065990941
Device Problems Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings (1535); Patient-Device Incompatibility (2682)
Patient Problems Unspecified Infection (1930); Keratitis (1944); Pain (1994)
Event Date 12/20/2018
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Investigation, including root cause analysis, is in progress.A supplemental mdr will be filed as necessary in accordance with 21 cfr 803.56 when additional reportable information becomes available.The device history records (dhr) for the device was reviewed.The associated device was released based on company acceptance criteria.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
A facility representative reported the flap was separated but the edge of the flap had to be cut with scissors.Follow up information received stated the patient was diagnosed with herpes viral keratitis after the surgery.The patient complained the eyes hurt.The cornea is turbid but slowly getting better.There are multiple related reports for this event.This report addresses the seventh eye performed for the surgical day, and another manufacturer report will be filed for the other affected cases.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The manufacturer internal reference number is: (b)(4).
 
Event Description
Initial information also stated after ablation, a very thin residual stroma was found in the right eye.Flap thickness was 350 microns and residual stroma was 150 microns.The patient is on topical steroids, antibiotics, and hormones.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Review of the logfiles for the day of treatment shows no relevant errors that could contribute to the reported event.During start-up of the system the vacuum, the energy and the ablation tests were performed without any relevant errors.The logfile shows all treatments finished successfully on that day.The logfile shows the energy is stable during treatment.No relevant deviation between planned and performed energy is detectable for the treatment.The user operated surgery with the recommended settings.Additionally, the logfile shows that the user performed energy check at system startup and then performed second energy check four and half hours later.No abnormality regarding z-offset setting can be identified.No technical root cause is detectable during logfile review.According to received information in the postoperative pictures (that were made 3-4 days after the surgery) the flap of the right eye has a thickness of ca.350 mkm in the center and gets thinner to the periphery.Follow up information shows the patient has a postoperative issue with herpes keratitis.It is not sure if this condition was already present preoperatively and how this might have had an influence to the reported event.Clinical application specialist (cas) review stated a poor and decentered docking are noticeable on the right eye.From the clinical perspective that might have led to the decentered and sticky flap, but does not explain the thickness.The treatment report shows the eyes have not been fully applanated and that there was a lot of liquid between the cornea and the patient interface.Usually such poor docking would lead to rather thinner flaps.Therefore, this can not be directly linked to the apparently thick flap.With the current provided data a further investigation can not be done.Knowing that there have been multiple cases with poor docking, long suction times and sticky flaps, it is strongly recommended for further training and reviewing the docking principles with this customer.No technical root cause was identified as the system was operating within specifications.The root cause could not be determined conclusively.The possible root cause for the incomplete flap could be docking technique or eye movement during treatment.The root cause for the thick flap after surgery could not be determined conclusively.The manufacturer internal reference number is: (b)(4).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
WAVELIGHT FS200 FEMTOSECOND LASER
Type of Device
POWERED LASER SURGICAL INSTRUMENT
Manufacturer (Section D)
WAVELIGHT GMBH
am wolfsmantel 5
erlangen 91058
GM  91058
MDR Report Key8253541
MDR Text Key133242571
Report Number3003288808-2019-00057
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code GEX
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
K101006
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 05/17/2019
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number8065990941
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 12/20/2018
Initial Date FDA Received01/16/2019
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received02/07/2019
05/02/2019
Supplement Dates FDA Received02/22/2019
05/17/2019
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other; Required Intervention;
Patient Age28 YR
-
-