• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: TORAX MEDICAL, INC. 1.5T LINX, 15B; ANTI-REFLUX IMPLANT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

TORAX MEDICAL, INC. 1.5T LINX, 15B; ANTI-REFLUX IMPLANT Back to Search Results
Catalog Number LXMC15
Device Problem Migration (4003)
Patient Problems Foreign Body In Patient (2687); No Code Available (3191)
Event Date 01/03/2019
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Attempts have been made to retrieve the device.To date the device has not been returned.If the device or further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.The dhr for lot 14308 was reviewed.No reworks, ncrs, or defects related to the product complaint were found.Attempts are being made to obtain the following information.To date no response has been provided.If further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.It was reported that the device was found to be slightly lower than where it should have been.How was this migration of the device diagnosed (chest x-ray, esophageal line at explant)? please explain.We are looking for a time timeline of the event: when did the dysphagia start? when was the migration of the device diagnosed (prior to the dysphagia or after)? when did the patient have the gastric poem? when the device was explanted could it be confirmed that device was in the correct position/geometry? did the patient have an autoimmune disease? is the patient currently taking steroids / immunization drugs? did the patient have any pre-existing dysphagia or other conditions (other than gerd)? how severe was the dysphagia/odynophagia before intervention? does the surgeon believe that the dysphagia was contributed to by the movement of the device? did the dysphagia improve after the device was implanted initially? were there any intra-operative complications during implant? was there any hiatal or crural repair done at the same time as the implant?.
 
Event Description
It was reported that there was a linx device removal due to the patient having dysphagia.The device was found to be slightly lower than where it should¿ve been.The case was completed with the patient being converted to a toupet.This patient underwent a gastric poem a week after linx implantation.The doctor was thinking this instrumentation during the important encapsulation period could¿ve lead to this.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Additional information was requested, and the following was obtained: response: i¿ve followed up with the surgeon on three occasions now and no other information is available.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
1.5T LINX, 15B
Type of Device
ANTI-REFLUX IMPLANT
Manufacturer (Section D)
TORAX MEDICAL, INC.
4188 lexington avenue north
shoreview MN
MDR Report Key8261655
MDR Text Key133712787
Report Number3008766073-2019-00259
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LEI
UDI-Device Identifier00855106005356
UDI-Public00855106005356
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
P100049
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 01/03/2019
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date03/15/2021
Device Catalogue NumberLXMC15
Device Lot Number14308
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 01/03/2019
Initial Date FDA Received01/18/2019
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received01/22/2019
Supplement Dates FDA Received01/24/2019
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-