MAUDE Adverse Event Report: C.R. BARD, INC. (GFO) LUTONIX 035 DRUG COATED BALLOON PTA CATHETER

Model Number 9004

Device Problems Off-Label Use (1494); Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)

Patient Problem Reocclusion (1985)

Event Date 12/19/2018

Event Type  Injury  

Manufacturer Narrative

The sample was not returned from the user facility; therefore, a device evaluation is unable to be performed.A lot history review this is the only complaint associated with this lot.A review of the device history record (dhr) indicates the lot was manufactured to specification.The actual sample was not received for evaluation.The dhr found nothing to indicate a manufacturing related cause for this event.The investigator assessed the event was not related to the study device or procedure.Based on the instructions for use (ifu), the occurrence of reocclusion, which led to the worsening of the pvd, is an inherent risk of any pta procedure, and has been reported in clinical trials of drug coated balloons.If additional information becomes known to the manufacturer, a supplemental report will be provided with all relevant information.The information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.

Event Description

It was reported through a clinical registry that during the index procedure, a lutonix percutaneous transluminal drug coated balloon (dcb) dilatation catheter was used to treat the target lesion located in the right common femoral artery (cfa) and right proximal superficial femoral artery (sfa).Treatment in the right cfa is not an approved indication per the instructions for use (ifu), thus the physician used the lutonix dcb off-label.Approximately 6 months after the index procedure, the patient had worsening peripheral vascular disease (pvd) in target limb due to reocclusion.A revascularization was performed on the target lesion, right common femoral artery (cfa), and right mid sfa.The revascularization on the target lesion and right cfa (not target lesion) involved a scoring balloon and a dcb.The right mid sfa was treated with a drug eluting stent (des).The heath care professional (hcp) deemed the revascularization successful.The investigator assessed that the event was possibly related to the study device and procedure.The sample was discarded by the user facility and is not available for evaluation.No adverse patient effects were reported.

Manufacturer Narrative

The event description was changed from "it was reported through a clinical registry that during the index procedure, a lutonix percutaneous transluminal drug coated balloon (dcb) dilatation catheter was used to treat the target lesion located in the right common femoral artery (cfa) and right proximal superficial femoral artery (sfa).Treatment in the right cfa is not an approved indication per the instructions for use (ifu), thus the physician used the lutonix dcb off-label.Approximately 6 months after the index procedure, the patient had worsening peripheral vascular disease (pvd) in target limb due to reocclusion.A revascularization was performed on the target lesion, right common femoral artery (cfa), and right mid sfa.The revascularization on the target lesion and right cfa (not target lesion) involved a scoring balloon and a dcb.The right mid sfa was treated with a drug eluting stent (des).The heath care professional (hcp) deemed the revascularization successful.The investigator assessed that the event was possibly related to the study device and procedure.The sample was discarded by the user facility and is not available for evaluation.No adverse patient effects were reported." to "it was reported through a clinical registry that during the index procedure, a lutonix percutaneous transluminal drug coated balloon (dcb) dilatation catheter was used to treat the target lesion located in the right common femoral artery (cfa) and right proximal superficial femoral artery (sfa).Treatment in the right cfa is not an approved indication per the instructions for use (ifu), thus the physician used the lutonix dcb off-label.Approximately 6 months after the index procedure, the patient's target lesion was reportedly reoccluded.A revascularization was performed on the target lesion, right common femoral artery (cfa), and right mid sfa.The revascularization on the target lesion and right cfa (not target lesion) involved a scoring balloon and a non-lutonix dcb.The right mid sfa was treated with a drug eluting stent (des).The heath care professional (hcp) deemed the revascularization successful.The investigator assessed that the event was possibly related to the study device and procedure.The sample was discarded by the user facility and is not available for evaluation.No adverse patient effects were reported." corrected data: the eval code + desc - results code "213" was removed because the investigator deemed the event possibly related to the study device.The conclusion had the following sentences changed from "the investigator assessed the event was not related to the study device or procedure.Based on the instructions for use (ifu), the occurrence of reocclusion, which led to the worsening of the pvd, is an inherent risk of any pta procedure, and has been reported in clinical trials of drug coated balloons." to "the investigator assessed the event was possibly related to the study device and procedure.Based on the instructions for use (ifu), the occurrence of reocclusion is an inherent risk of any pta procedure and has been reported in clinical trials of drug coated balloons." analysis: the sample was not returned from the user facility; therefore, a device evaluation is unable to be performed.A lot history review revealed this is the only complaint associated with this lot.A review of the device history record (dhr) indicates the lot was manufactured to specification.Conclusion: the actual sample was not received for evaluation.The dhr found nothing to indicate a manufacturing related cause for this event.The investigator assessed the event was possibly related to the study device and procedure.Based on the instructions for use (ifu), the occurrence of reocclusion is an inherent risk of any pta procedure and has been reported in clinical trials of drug coated balloons.If additional information becomes known to the manufacturer, a supplemental report will be provided with all relevant information.

Event Description

It was reported through a clinical registry that during the index procedure, a lutonix percutaneous transluminal drug coated balloon (dcb) dilatation catheter was used to treat the target lesion located in the right common femoral artery (cfa) and right proximal superficial femoral artery (sfa).Treatment in the right cfa is not an approved indication per the instructions for use (ifu), thus the physician used the lutonix dcb off-label.Approximately 6 months after the index procedure, the patient's target lesion was reportedly reoccluded.A revascularization was performed on the target lesion, right common femoral artery (cfa), and right mid sfa.The revascularization on the target lesion and right cfa (not target lesion) involved a scoring balloon and a non-lutonix dcb.The right mid sfa was treated with a drug eluting stent (des).The heath care professional (hcp) deemed the revascularization successful.The investigator assessed that the event was possibly related to the study device and procedure.The sample was discarded by the user facility and is not available for evaluation.No adverse patient effects were reported.

• Brand Name: LUTONIX 035 DRUG COATED BALLOON PTA CATHETER
• Type of Device: DRUG COATED BALLOON PTA CATHETER
• Manufacturer (Section D): C.R. BARD, INC. (GFO); 289 bay road; queensbury NY 12804
• MDR Report Key: 8269088
• MDR Text Key: 133830321
• Report Number: 3006513822-2019-00006
• Device Sequence Number: 1
• Product Code: ONU
• UDI-Device Identifier: 00801741123306
• UDI-Public: (01)00801741123306
• Combination Product (y/n): N
• PMA/PMN Number: P130024
• Number of Events Reported: 1
• Summary Report (Y/N): N
• Report Source: Manufacturer
• Source Type: health professional,other,stu
• Type of Report: Initial,Followup
• Report Date: 02/21/2019

1 Device was Involved in the Event

1 Patient was Involved in the Event

• Is this an Adverse Event Report?: Yes
• Is this a Product Problem Report?: No
• Device Operator: Health Professional
• Device Expiration Date: 01/08/2021
• Device Model Number: 9004
• Device Catalogue Number: LX3513061505F
• Device Lot Number: GFCN0499
• Was Device Available for Evaluation?: No
• Event Location: Hospital
• Initial Date Manufacturer Received: 12/26/2018
• Initial Date FDA Received: 01/22/2019
• Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received: 02/16/2019
• Supplement Dates FDA Received: 02/21/2019
• Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device?: No
• Patient Sequence Number: 1
• Patient Outcome(s): Required Intervention
• Patient Age: 78 YR
• Patient Weight: 70