|
Model Number 85900PJ |
Device Problem
Material Separation (1562)
|
Patient Problem
No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
|
Event Date 10/10/2018 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Internal reference: (b)(4).Facility declined to provide patient information of id, gender, age and weight.The implant or explant dates are not applicable to this device.Concomitant medical products: no information available.State/prefecture is (b)(6).
|
|
Event Description
|
This case was reviewed and investigated according to the manufacturer¿s policy.It was reported during a planned therapeutic peripheral procedure, inside the body, while passing through the lesion, the image on the manufacture¿s device disappeared.There is no patient injury.Access location; femoral, calcification; severe.Visual and microscopic inspection were performed on the returned device.The distal tip was slightly deformed.There were striations observed at both the distal fillet and the proximal fillet.It was confirmed adhesive from the distal fillet was lifted, had rough edges and was missing tiny portions of adhesive from the scratches sustained on the distal fillet.The probable cause of the observed missing adhesive on the distal fillet could not be conclusively determined by the investigation.Strain, impact, and forces associated with use and handling can affect the integrity of the device.It could not be determined when or how the cause of the damage occurred.The manufacturing documentation for this device was reviewed and the device met all quality and manufacturing release criteria.This product problem is being submitted because adhesive was missing from the manufacture¿s device and it could not be concluded when the separation occurred.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Internal reference: 234376 this case was reviewed and investigated according to the manufacturer¿s policy.Inadvertently omitted.Submission of this report does not, in itself, represent a conclusion by the manufacturer and/or authorized representative or the national competent authority that the content of this report is complete or accurate, that the medical device(s) listed failed in any manner and/or that the medical device(s) caused or contributed to the alleged death or deterioration in the state of the health of any person.
|
|
Event Description
|
This follow-up supplemental report #1 is being submitted because block g3 was inadvertently omitted in the initial report submission.
|
|
Event Description
|
This case was reviewed and investigated according to the manufacturer's policy.Internal reference: (b)(4).This follow-up supplemental report #2 is being submitted to report additional investigation findings, to wit: there is no potential for harm if the malfunction were to recur.This complaint was reassessed based on an engineering study that indicated, this family of catheters do not exhibit any adhesive detachment during normal use.There is no evidence of abnormal use conditions, it is likely the adhesive detached post-procedure, during the process of returning the device for analysis.There was no patient injury, no status decline, no adverse event, and no unplanned additional medical or surgical intervention reported.There is no potential for harm if the malfunction were to recur.Submission of this report does not, in itself, represent a conclusion by the manufacturer and/or authorized representative or the national competent authority that the content of this report is complete or accurate, that the medical device(s) listed failed in any manner and/or that the medical device(s) caused or contributed to the alleged death or deterioration in the state of the health of any person.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Block h6: supplemental report #2 indicated that the adhesive likely detached post procedure; however, the conclusion code was not updated from 4315 (cause not established) to 4308 (cause traced to transport/storage).
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|