• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: GYRUS ACMI, INC IGLESIAS WORKING ELEMENT; K951972

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

GYRUS ACMI, INC IGLESIAS WORKING ELEMENT; K951972 Back to Search Results
Model Number EIWE
Device Problem Sparking (2595)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 01/16/2019
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
The reference device was not returned to olympus for evaluation.The exact cause of the reported event cannot be determined.However, the instruction manual warns users ¿introduce a new plasmakinetic supersect/loop device and the instrument cable into the sterile field.Insert the t-shaped connector on the instrument cable into the slot on the base of the white instrument mounting block.Ensure that the connector is fully seated within the block.¿ in addition , the oem has attributed this type of phenomenon to fluids invading the connection block causing an electrical short to occur due to the poor connection of the electrode, working element and cable.
 
Event Description
Olympus was informed that during a transurethral resection of the prostate procedure, there was a spark and then smoke that occurred at the actuator block of the device when used with a non-olympus electrode (boston scientific).The monopolar resectoscope equipment was switched out to all gyrus pk sp bipolar resectoscope equipment and the intended procedure was completed.There was no patient harm reported.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This supplemental report is being submitted to provide the device evaluation results.A visual inspection of the received condition of the device found charring deposits inside electrode openings of the actuation block and cracks on o-ring inside the rack support.The device was then checked with olympus test electrode, active cord, and generator.There was no no spark or smoke observed during activation.In addition, the device passed the leak test.The cause of the reported event could not be conclusively determined as evaluation could not confirm the reported event and the concomitant devices that were used in the procedure were not returned along with the device for evaluation.Based on the similar reported complaint, the instruction manual provides instruction and warning that the device is to be used with a standard monopolar generator usa elite system, and recommended electrodes by oem.Also, if incomplete/improper assembly of the electrode to the active cord connector, are not locked in place, and resulted in an intermittent connection that could have produced arcing or sparking from the device.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This supplemental report is being submitted to provide the dhr review for the referenced device.The device was manufactured in january 2018.A review of the dhr records were conducted and there were no defects, nonconforming issues or any corrective action issues during the manufacturing of the device.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
IGLESIAS WORKING ELEMENT
Type of Device
K951972
Manufacturer (Section D)
GYRUS ACMI, INC
136 turnpike road
southborough MA 01772
MDR Report Key8276708
MDR Text Key134362197
Report Number2951238-2019-00391
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FBO
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
K951972
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 03/20/2019
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberEIWE
Device Lot NumberUNKNOWN
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer01/25/2019
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 01/16/2019
Initial Date FDA Received01/24/2019
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received02/28/2019
03/20/2019
Supplement Dates FDA Received03/19/2019
03/20/2019
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-