It was reported that during an unknown procedure, a three-way plastic stopcock leaked.According to the reporter, the leak occurred continuously from the middle of the hub.A section of the device did not remain inside the patient¿s body.The patient did not require any additional procedures due to this occurrence.According to the initial reporter, the patient did not experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.Additional information regarding event details and patient outcome has been requested, but is not available at this time.
|
Blank fields on this form indicate the information is unknown, unavailable, or unchanged.Investigation ¿ evaluation.A review of the complaint history, device history record, and a functional test & visual inspection of the returned device were conducted during the investigation.The visual inspection of the returned package confirmed that one used, plastic 3-way stopcock, ptws-2fll-mll-r, was returned for investigation.The device had an orange substance on the exterior.Leakage was noted from a crack as well as underneath the hex nut.Additionally, a document based investigation evaluation was performed.There is no evidence to suggest the product was not made to specifications.A review of the device history record showed no nonconforming events which could contribute to this failure mode.It should be noted there were no other reported complaints for this lot number.Furthermore, a review of the manufactures instructions and quality control procedures was conducted, and a gap was discovered.It is noted that within the quality control procedures, the products tested on high pressure must be discarded.However, the work order does not notate or list that those devices from the lot were in fact checked or discarded.Measures are being conducted to address this failure mode.Based on the information provided and the examination of the returned product, investigation has concluded that this failure can be traced to the device being inadequately designed for the purpose.Measures are being conducted to address this failure mode.We will continue our monitoring of similar complaints and have notified the appropriate personnel of this event.Per the quality engineering risk assessment no further action is required.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803.This report is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement made in it is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned; that a death or serious injury occurred; or that any cook device caused or contributed to; or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|