The root cause of the incident is unknown at the time of the initial report.The complaint device was recently returned for evaluation, but the evaluation has not begun yet.The dhr review of the complaint lot 648399 and related subassembly lots 647857, 647856 was performed and there was found no deviation which could contribute to the reported incident.The devices passed all 100% in process inspections and aql based inspections.The manufacturer informed manufacturing operators and qc inspectors about the complaint.No remedial actions were initiated at the time of the initial report, since the exact root cause was not determined yet.
|
The dhr review of the complaint lot 648399 and related subassembly lots 647857 and 647856 was performed and there was found no deviation which could contribute to the reported incident.The devices passed all 100% in process inspections and aql based inspections.Sample evaluation: the sample was sent for decontamination.After the decontamination the sample was inspected and the reported issue was confirmed.Complaint investigation information: the customer provided to cmi additional information, that the doctor felt a slight resistance when he swapped the short sheath for the 6f 45cm fortress, but he was not concerned by this.Before starting to withdraw the sheath, the doctor had the dilator and stiff guidewire in place.He felt more resistance during the removal of the sheath, and could see that the sheath was elongating.Although the dilator was in place, further elongating of the sheath did not stop and sheath snapped into two parts.For the investigation purposes, the returned device was tested for the tensile force of the sheath.The sheath was initially put into the water bath (37°c) for two hours to simulate the use in the patient.Subsequently, the destructive pull tests were performed on nine samples cut from the returned device.As described in iso 11070:2014, for the smallest outside diameter >=1,850mm, the minimum peak tensile force is 15n.Cmi's internal document technical specification and customer's requirements document defines that the tensile strength which leads to failure of the sheath must be >35n.According to the results, the iso requirement as well as cmi's internal/customer's requirements, for the tensile force were fulfilled for all six samples which were taken from the part of the sheath which was not deformed.The other three samples taken from the deformed part had a lower tensile force, which is caused by the sheath elongation and subsequent decrease of the mechanical durability of the sheath.Instructions for use, section warnings states: "do not attempt to advance or withdraw the introducer, guide wire, catheter, or other interventional device if resistance is felt.Use fluoroscopy to determine the cause.If the cause cannot be determined and corrected, discontinue the procedure and withdraw the introducer sheath.Continued advancement or retraction against resistance may result in serious injury, and/or breakage of the guide wire, introducer sheath, catheter or interventional medical device." root cause: the root cause is unknown, could not be determined.
|