The manufacturing records for the on-x aortic conform ext 21, onxace-21, sn (b)(4).Were reviewed and it was confirmed that all records were controlled, available for review, and met all specifications per the device master record.All lots passed functional testing and met release specifications.Onxace-21 sn (b)(4).Was implanted (b)(6) 2018 in the aortic position of a 60 year old male participating as patient (b)(6) in the on-x aortic post approval study from which this notice was obtained.A complication report was filed per study requirements indicating that the patient had developed complete heart block [chb] postoperatively, but on the same day of surgery.This was remediated seven days later (b)(6) 2018) with the implantation of a permanent pacemaker.As this was part of a clinical study, the event was reviewed by an expert panel who concluded that the chb was a consequence of the technical aspects of the [surgical] procedure and not due to a defect in the valve.However, per the akins criteria for reporting morbidity and mortality after cardiac valve interventions [akins 2008], the need for a new permanent pacemaker or defibrillator within 14 days after valve intervention is considered a major adverse valve-related event.Still, it should be noted that this classification does not necessarily blame the valve for any malfunction, but rather that the surgical intervention in placing the valve disrupts the anatomy in the vicinity of the valve through which the normal conduction pathway passes.The instructions for use (ifu) list cardiac arrhythmia as a potential adverse event that could lead to reoperation.It also lists prosthesis nonstructural dysfunction which would correspond with the akin classification of a pacer implantation within 14 days post-implant as being valve-related.But there is no evidence that the on-x valve itself failed to perform as designed and expected.This event does not identify additional hazards or modify the probability and severity of existing hazards.No further action is required.This report is being submitted as required by federal regulations and does not constitute an admission that the device caused or contributed to the reported event.Furthermore, this report reflects the event as alleged by the complainant and does not imply that the information reported to cryolife is accurate or has been confirmed by cryolife.
|