The associated device was returned and evaluated.A visual inspection of the returned device confirmed the stated failure mode.The tip of the threaded end of the device fractured off and was not returned.The device was manufactured in 2010 and exhibits signs of extensive wear/usage.The tip fracture is most likely due to impact forces.If during impaction, sufficient side loads are transferred to the tip of the device, a mechanical overload or fatigue fracture can occur.A review of complaint history did not reveal additional complaints for the listed batch.A review of the manufacturing records did not reveal a manufacturing abnormality that could have caused or contributed to the reported incident.At this time, we have no reason to suspect that the product failed to meet any product specifications at the time of manufacture.We recommend that all reusable instruments be routinely inspected for wear and damage and replaced as necessary.The clinical medical investigation concluded that, based on the reported condition of the 10 year old instrument, the ¿extensive wear/usage¿ cannot be ruled out as a possible contributing factor to the broken/retained impactor tip.The retained 17-4ph stainless steel tip is not an implantable alloy; therefore, long-term implantation data is not available but the exposure will be limited while it remains within the stem.No patient impact was reported as a result of the retained threaded tip; however, possible corrosion, micro-motion and/or migration cannot be definitively ruled out, although reportedly the surgeon ¿felt it posed no threat¿.No further medical assessment needed.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.Should additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.No further investigation is warranted for this complaint; however we will continue to monitor for future complaints and investigate as necessary.
|