Zoll has not received the autopulse platform (sn (b)(4)) for investigation.A supplemental report will be filed when the investigation has been completed.Chest compression, as a part of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (cpr), has a high rate of patient adverse events.Common injuries (skin, rib, sternum and spine fracture), common internal organ injuries (liver and spleen), and common clinical events secondary to those injuries (pneumothorax) are expected adverse event for both manual and mechanical cprs.The chest compression generated by the autopulse system may lead to an injury profile that is no worse than manual cpr.Similarly, a randomized trial of manual cpr and phased manual plus autopulse cpr found no difference in cardiac, pulmonary or cerebral damage.Complications in autopulse-treated patients occurred at a rate not exceeding that of manual cpr.The aha guidelines 2000 states, "even properly performed chest compressions can cause rib fractures in adult patients." the guidelines further state, "concern for injuries that may complicate cpr should not impede prompt and energetic application of cpr.The only alternative to timely initiation of effective cpr for the victim of cardiac arrest is death." the recently released guidelines 2005 deliver a similar message, "rib fractures and other injuries are common but acceptable consequences of cpr given the alternative of death from cardiac arrest." the 2015 aha guidelines update for cpr reemphasized the importance of high-quality chest compressions, and recommends to ensure adequate compression rates and adequate compression depth.Rib fractures and other injuries are common but acceptable consequences of manual and mechanical cpr.Concern for injuries that may complicate cpr should not impede prompt and energetic application of cpr.The only alternative to timely initiation of effective cpr for the victim of cardiac arrest is death.In this case, when the autopulse platform (sn (b)(4)) was used on a cardiac arrest patient, the lifeband was placed in the same side as the defibrillator pad was on the patient's chest, and they got attached to each other.This caused the defibrillator pad become displaced and damaged, and the patient's skin abrasions.No additional information about the patient status and treatment.Based on available information, the event of patient's skin abrasions was not serious since it didn't meet any criteria of seriousness per regulations.This event was caused by user error, and it was not related to the autopulse device.Please see the following related mfr report: mfr 3010617000-2019-00087 for the lifeband.
|
As reported, the autopulse platform (sn (b)(4)) was used on a cardiac arrest patient.During compressions the lifeband and the defibrillator pad on the left side of the patient's chest got attached to one another, causing the pad to become displaced and damaged.Per user, the pad looked like it was shredded and the patient had skin abrasions.Per user, the issue was caused by human factors, not mechanical.However, no additional information received about those human factors from the customer.Per user, the unit was deployed several times since the incident without further issues.No additional information about the patient status and treatment.
|