• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: RICHARD WOLF GMBH WORKING ELEMENT ACTIVE MONO 12/30°

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

RICHARD WOLF GMBH WORKING ELEMENT ACTIVE MONO 12/30° Back to Search Results
Model Number 8654.204
Device Problem Temperature Problem (3022)
Patient Problem Full thickness (Third Degree) Burn (2696)
Event Date 10/08/2018
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Rwmic submitting report on behalf of rw (b)(4) (manufacturer).As different products were used, the instructions for use of the products used in combination were reviewed.The burning was most likely caused by leakage current flowing through the patient's body in small quantities during each rf application.If the patient's body is touched by a small area during hf activation, e.G.With the fingertip, the high current density may cause combustion.In order to largely avoid the well-known phenomenon of burning by leakage current, it is recommended to keep the effect of the hf current as low as possible and to avoid skin-to-skin contact during activation.Device labeling was reviewed for patient code and device codes, see below: caution! take care not to select the wrong irrigation fluid! take care not to use high conductivity irrigation fluid for monopolar hf applications, as this would lead to increased danger of patient leakage currents, no function of the hf instrument.The user must choose the irrigation fluid as required by the application and the irrigation fluid must have a low electrical conductivity.Do not use nacl (saline) solution.Caution! danger of elevated temperatures when working without irrigation fluid! injuries to the mucous membrane due to excessive temperatures endanger the patient.Activate the electrode only while it is immersed in irrigation fluid and under continuous irrigation.(b)(4) considers this report closed.
 
Event Description
On november 07, 2018, richard wolf medical instruments corporation (rwmic) received a report from richard wolf (b)(4) involving the following devices: 815.052 lot 523/573 (mdr 9611102-2018-00015), 815.032 lot 006/086 (mdr 9611102-2018-00016), 8674.205 lot 1259038 (mdr 9611102-2018-00017), 8680.205 lot 1255367 (mdr 9611102-2018-00018), 8654.204 lot 1202777 (this mdr).It was reported that the patient suffered third degree burn on the right finger due to hf application.The device was returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.The inspection showed that the cause of the fault described by the user cannot be traced back to the working elements or hf connection cable mono.Probable root cause was determined to be use error.No defects were found in the medical devices.In conclusion, the combustion was not caused by a faulty hf device or accessory.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
WORKING ELEMENT ACTIVE MONO 12/30°
Type of Device
WORKING ELEMENT ACTIVE MONO 12/30°
Manufacturer (Section D)
RICHARD WOLF GMBH
pforzheimer street 32
knittlingen, 75438
GM  75438
Manufacturer (Section G)
RICHARD WOLF GMBH
pforzheimer street 32
knittlingen, 75438
GM   75438
Manufacturer Contact
oliver ehrlich
pforzheimer street 32
knittlingen, 75438
GM   75438
MDR Report Key8363755
MDR Text Key136927213
Report Number9611102-2018-00019
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FDC
UDI-Device Identifier04055207018712
UDI-Public04055207018712
Combination Product (y/n)N
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type foreign
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 10/16/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Device Operator No Information
Device Model Number8654.204
Device Catalogue Number8654.204
Device Lot Number1202777
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 10/16/2018
Initial Date FDA Received02/22/2019
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured02/26/2013
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
-
-