• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO. INTERSTIM II; STIMULATOR, ELECTRICAL, IMPLANTABLE, FOR INCONTINENCE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO. INTERSTIM II; STIMULATOR, ELECTRICAL, IMPLANTABLE, FOR INCONTINENCE Back to Search Results
Model Number 3058
Device Problems Break (1069); Shipping Damage or Problem (1570); Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993); Insufficient Information (3190)
Patient Problems Complaint, Ill-Defined (2331); Injury (2348); Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque (3165)
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Other relevant device(s) are: product id: 3889-28, serial/lot #: (b)(4), ubd: 01-may-2022, udi #: (b)(4), implanted: (b)(6) 2018, product type: lead.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Information was received from the healthcare professional (hcp), via the manufacturer¿s representative, regarding a patient with an implantable neurostimulator (ins) for urinary dysfunction/sacral nerve stimulation and gastrointestinal/pelvic floor.It was reported that the patient had the lead and ins replaced.It was noted that the doctor tried to remove the old lead but it broke off.It was unknown if there were any environmental/external/patient factors that may have led to the issue.As diagnostics and actions taken performed to resolve the issue, multiple reprogrammings were performed.At the time, the doctor believed the risk was to high to go digging after the fragment.The patient then went to another doctor and had a new lead and ins placed.The other doctor removed the old fragment of the lead that the previous physician could not remove.It was unknown if the issue was resolved.The patient status was noted as ¿alive ¿ no injury¿.There were no further complications reported or anticipated.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Product id: 3889-28, lot# va14dvf, implanted: (b)(6) 2016, explanted: (b)(6) 2017, product type: lead.Correction: notified date should be 2019-feb-12.(b)(4).If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Information was received from an attorney regarding a patient.It was reported that there were two leads located within the patient¿s body, their existing lead and the replacement lead.The patient¿s previous/existing lead, which was implanted on (b)(6) 2016, was left in their body and eventually removed on (b)(6) 2018.It was further reported that the patient¿s physician attempted to remove the old lead when implanting their replacement lead on (b)(6) 2017, but the lead broke off.At the time, the physician believed the risk was too high to dig after it.As a result, the patient had suffered greatly, both mentally and physically.It was reported that the patient sustained injuries as a result of the lead fragment being left in their body and was forced to undergo an additional and unnecessary surgery.It was reported that the device was not properly manufactured or designed to prevent injury to the consumer.It was alleged that the medical devices were in a defective condition and unreasonably dangerous when put to use, and that the defective condition existed when the products were sold and placed in the stream of commerce.The devices failed and did not operate properly, leading to severe physical injury.It was unknown if there were any environmental or external factors that may have led or contributed to the issue.The manufacturer representative further reported that multiple reprogramming sessions were performed, but it was unknown if the issue was resolved.It was noted that the patient saw a different physician who was able to remove the old fragment of the lead that the previous physician could not remove.No further complications were reported or anticipated.Indications for use were gastrointestinal/pelvic floor and urinary dysfunction/sacral nerve stimulation.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
INTERSTIM II
Type of Device
STIMULATOR, ELECTRICAL, IMPLANTABLE, FOR INCONTINENCE
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO.
road 31, km. 24, hm 4
ceiba norte industrial park
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO.
road 31, km. 24, hm 4
ceiba norte industrial park
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer Contact
lisa woodward clark
7000 central avenue ne rcw215
minneapolis, MN 55432
7635263920
MDR Report Key8367527
MDR Text Key137056525
Report Number3004209178-2019-03916
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code EZW
UDI-Device Identifier00613994913654
UDI-Public00613994913654
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P970004
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 03/06/2019
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date05/28/2017
Device Model Number3058
Device Catalogue Number3058
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 02/21/2019
Initial Date FDA Received02/25/2019
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received02/12/2019
Supplement Dates FDA Received03/06/2019
Date Device Manufactured12/02/2015
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Weight58
-
-