• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: C.R. BARD, INC. (GFO) LUTONIX 035 DRUG COATED BALLOON PTA CATHETER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

C.R. BARD, INC. (GFO) LUTONIX 035 DRUG COATED BALLOON PTA CATHETER Back to Search Results
Model Number 9004
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Reocclusion (1985); Claudication (2550)
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Analysis: the samples were not returned from the user facility; therefore, device evaluations are unable to be performed.The lot history review could not be conducted because the lot number, although requested, was not available from the user facility.The dhr review also was not conducted because the facility did not provide the lot number.Conclusion: the actual samples were not returned for evaluation.The dhr review was not conducted because the facility did not provide the lot number.Based on the instructions for use (ifu), the occurrence of reocclusion and claudication are inherent risks of any pta procedure.If additional information becomes known to the manufacturer, a supplemental report will be provided with all relevant information.
 
Event Description
It was reported through a literature article that during the index procedure, three lutonix percutaneous transluminal drug coated balloon (dcb) dilatation catheters were used to treat the target lesion in the superficial femoral artery (sfa) and popliteal artery.Approximately 6 months after the index procedure, the patient was re-examined due to right calf claudication after walking 100 meters.A new duplex ultrasound (dus) revealed greater than 75% reocclusion just proximal to the eluvia stent which was placed due to a dissection occurring after the use of lutonix dcb's during the index procedure.The health care professional (hcp) presumed the reocclusion was a result of neointimal hyperplasia from balloon trauma, given that there was no clinical or biochemical evidence of an acute inflammatory flare of giant cell arteritis (gca).In the opinion of the investigator, the occurrence of reocclusion is possibly related to the lutonix dcb.The remainder of the sfa and stent appeared widely patent with no significant stenosis.An angioplasty procedure is planned involving the use of dcb's.The lutonix dcb's were discarded by the user facility and are not available for return.No adverse patient outcomes were reported.This is one of three products involved with the reported event and the associated manufacturer¿s report numbers are 3006513822-2019-00034 and 3006513822-2019-00035.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
LUTONIX 035 DRUG COATED BALLOON PTA CATHETER
Type of Device
DRUG COATED BALLOON PTA CATHETER
Manufacturer (Section D)
C.R. BARD, INC. (GFO)
289 bay road
queensbury NY 12804
Manufacturer (Section G)
C.R. BARD, INC. (GFO)
289 bay road
queensbury NY 12804
Manufacturer Contact
mike gaffney
9409 science center dr
new hope, MN 55428
7634458639
MDR Report Key8388658
MDR Text Key137837032
Report Number3006513822-2019-00036
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code ONU
UDI-Device Identifier00801741088759
UDI-Public(01)00801741088759
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeAS
PMA/PMN Number
P130024
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type distributor,foreign,literatur
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 03/04/2019
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number9004
Device Catalogue Number9040413500150
Device Lot NumberUNKNOWN
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Event Location Hospital
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 02/06/2019
Initial Date FDA Received03/04/2019
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age76 YR
-
-