Siemens filed the initial mdr 1219913-2019-00036 on march 08, 2019.On 03/11/2019 additional information: the customer was reporting samples that were run with advia centaur xpt br (ca 27.29) assay as advia centaur xpt ca15-3.The customer was previously using ca15-3 on an alternate method and the technical application specialist (tas) installed the br (ca 27.29) assay and correlated the br to the ca15-3 results from alternate method.There is an advia centaur xpt ca 15-3 assay that is available.The tas should have installed the advia centaur ca 15-3 assay.The advia centaur xpt br (ca 27.29) assay intended use is to aid in the monitoring of patients previously treated for state ii or stage iii breast cancer.The advia centaur xpt ca15-3 assay is an in vitro diagnostic test for quantitative serial determination of cancer antigen ca15-3.When used in conjunction with other clinical and diagnostic procedures, serial testing with the advia centaur ca 15-3 assay is useful for monitoring the course of disease and therapy in metastatic breast cancer patients, and for detection of recurrence in previously treated stage ii, with greater than two positive lymph nodes, or stage iii breast cancer patients.Both assays state in their ifu that "values obtained with different assay methods cannot be used interchangeably.If, in the course of monitoring a patient, the assay method used for determining serial levels of ca 15-3 and/or br is changed, the laboratory must perform additional serial testing to confirm baseline values." the side of the label of the reagent pack does state ca27.29.Therefore, the label on the reagent pack will not be updated.The advia centaur br ifu (b)(4) title states br assay for ca 27.29.The test definition states the test name as br and this cannot be edited by the customer.The only field that can be edited in the test definition is the print name and display name.Physicians have not questioned the results.The laboratory did inform the physicians of the error and there were no concerns noted by the physicians.The customer is operational.Based on the information provided, no product problem was identified.The instrument is performing within specifications.No further evaluation of the device is required.
|