WALDEMAR LINK GMBH & CO. KG STANDARD PROSTHESIS HEADS, CERAMIC PROSTHESIS HEAD A, BIOLOX®; LINK PROSTHESIS HEAD A CERAMIC
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Model Number 128-936/02 |
Device Problem
Fracture (1260)
|
Patient Problem
Hip Fracture (2349)
|
Event Date 02/19/2019 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The quality documents are reviewed.Further documents and the complaint sample were made available for an investigation.The incident will be investigated in cooperation with oem (ceramtec).After re-evaluation of the complaint we determined that this case is reportable as a foreign event.
|
|
Event Description
|
Translation: ceramic head defective.For revision surgery (b)(6) 2017 with lying cup and ceramic inlay (third-party product) and hip stem.Indication: periprosthetic fracture, hip shaft changed to mp with ceramic head telephone info on (b)(6) 2019 that ceramic is probably defective.New restoration inlay, neck section, intermediate ring, screw and ceramic head on (b)(6) 2019.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
[translate].The production documents and the acceptance test certificate have been inspected and checked by ceramtec.All test characteristics of this product correspond to the specifications valid at the time of manufacture.The density was determined on the existing fragments of the head and insert.The material-specific characteristics correspond to the respective specifications.There are no indications of a material defect.Secondary metal transfer can be found on both components, resulting from contact with metal parts after the primary damage event.Primary metal transfer is not present in the cone of the ceramic ball head.This indicates a disturbance of the interface between metal shaft and ceramic ball.Both primary fracture surfaces of the ball head can be identified.Due to secondary damage, the area of fracture formation cannot be identified.Furthermore, a primary metal transfer on the cone of the insert is not uniformly present, which indicates a disturbance of the interface between metal shell and insert.Here, too, the area of fracture origin cannot be determined unambiguously due to secondary damage.The cone surface of the neck part shows scratches as well as signs of wear, which indicate repeated contact with the insert and/or the fragments of the ball head after the fracture event.A failure of the interface between the metal shell and the ceramic insert may affect the stress distribution in the ceramic component and eventually cause fracture.Disruption of the interface between the metal shaft and the ceramic ball can lead to stress increases in the ball head and increase the risk of breakage.The fragments submitted for analysis do not allow a clear statement to be made as to which component is initially broken.The ceramic insert is from another manufacturer.According to the instructions for use, the combination with implants from other manufacturers and / or combinations of link implants that deviate from the specifications in the surgical technique is not verified by tests and is not permitted.
|
|
Event Description
|
Translation: ceramic head defective.For revision surgery on (b)(6) 2017 with lying cup and ceramic inlay (third-party product) and hip stem.Indication: periprosthetic fracture, hip shaft changed to mp with ceramic head telephone info on (b)(6) 2019 that ceramic is probably defective new restoration inlay, neck section, intermediate ring, screw and ceramic head on (b)(6) 2019.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|