WRIGHTS LANE SYNTHES USA PRODUCTS LLC TI DISTAL EXTENSION SIZE 7/220MM RADIUS; PROSTHESIS, RIB REPLACEMENT
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Model Number 04.641.117 |
Device Problem
Break (1069)
|
Patient Problems
Discomfort (2330); No Code Available (3191)
|
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).The device has been received, the investigation is in progress, no conclusion could be drawn at the time of filing this report.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the patient underwent a revision surgery on (b)(6) 2019 for a failed vertical expandable prosthetic titanium rib (veptr) titanium distal extension, titanium proximal extension and titanium distraction lock, these devices have breakage/fracture.The levels instrumented were t2-pelvic.The patient presented with some discomfort.X-rays revealed splaying of the rails of the proximal extension.The patient also was about to outgrow his extension on the contra-lateral side, so surgery was schedule to replace both sides.There was patient consequence due to myelomeningocele.Procedure outcome is unknown.The patient exposed to additional anesthesia for one (1) hour.Concomitant device reported: unk - rods: spine (part # unknown, lot # unknown # quantity # unknown).This report is for one (1) ti distal extension size 7/220mm radius.This is report 1 of 3 for complaint (b)(4).
|
|
Event Description
|
04/23/2019: updated event description: it was reported that on (b)(6) 2019, the patient underwent a revision surgery for a failed vertical expandable prosthetic titanium rib (veptr) titanium distal extension, titanium proximal extension and titanium distraction lock, these devices have breakage/fracture.The patient presented with some discomfort.X-rays revealed splaying of the rails of the proximal extension.The patient also was about to outgrow his extension on the contra-lateral side, so surgery was schedule to replace both sides.There was patient consequence due to myelomenigocele.Procedure outcome is unknown.The patient exposed to additional anesthesia for one (1) hour.Concomitant device reported: ti distraction lock (part # 497.125, lot # h468144, quantity # 1) unk - rods: spine (part # unknown, lot # unknown # quantity # unknown).This complaint involves two (2) devices.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.Updated event description.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.A device history record (dhr) review was conducted: part #04.641.117, lot #h082194, date of manufacture: 4/19/16, place of manufacture: brandywine plant, part expiration date: n/a.A review of the device history record revealed no complaint related anomalies.The device history record shows this lot of distal extension, 220, veptr ii product was processed through the normal manufacturing and inspection operations with no rework or nonconformities noted.This lot met all dimensional, visual and packaging criteria at the time of release with no issues documented during the manufacture that would contribute to this complaint condition.A review of the raw material device history record revealed this lot met all specifications with no nonconformances noted.This raw material lot met all dimensional and visual criteria at the time of manufacture with no issues documented during the manufacture that would contribute to this complaint condition.A product investigation was conducted.Visual inspection: the ti distal extension size 7/220 mm radius (part # 04.641.117, lot # h082194, mfg # 19-apr-2016) was received at us cq with the extension broken, the broken portion of the device was not returned to us cq.This is consistent with the reported complaint condition, thus confirming the complaint.Dimensional inspection: dimensional analysis was completed, the outer diameter of the shaft measured and is within specification based on relevant drawing.According to the drawing the overall length of the device should be approximately 260 mm.The length of the returned device measured 120.56 mm therefore, approximately 140 mm of the device broke off.Document/specification review: the relevant drawing(s) was reviewed; a review of the raw material device history record revealed this lot met all specifications with no non-conformances noted.This raw material lot met all dimensional and visual criteria at the time of manufacture with no issues documented during the manufacture that would contribute to this complaint condition.Conclusion: there is no indication that a design or manufacturing issue contributed to the complaint.While no definitive root cause could be determined it is possible that the device encountered unintended forces.No new malfunctions were observed during the course of this investigation.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post market safety surveillance activities.Based on the investigation findings, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|