This device was returned for service; however, did not meet manufacturing specifications during pre-repair assessment.During repair, it was determined that the reported condition was confirmed.The assignable root cause was determined to be due to wear from normal use over time.If additional information should become available, a supplemental medwatch will be submitted accordingly.(b)(4).
|
It was reported by (b)(6) that during service and evaluation, it was determined that the rotations per minute of the handpiece device were below specification, there was a hole/cut in the hose of the device, and the device had an excessive noise level (db).It was noted that the device was too loud, had too little speed, and holes in the hose.It was further determined that the device failed pretest for initial rotation speed, and noise verification.It was noted in the service order that the device had an undetermined malfunction while being used with the compact speed reducer device, a craniotome device, and attachment devices.This event did not occur during surgery.There was no patient involvement.There were no reports of injuries, medical intervention or prolonged hospitalization.All available information has been disclosed.If additional information should available, a supplemental medwatch will be submitted accordingly.
|