Internal reference: (b)(4).This case was reviewed and investigated according to the manufacturer¿s policy.Attempts to obtain patient information have been unsuccessful.Facility declined to provide patient information.The implant or explant dates are not applicable to this device.(b)(6).Device was not returned for investigation.The manufacturing documentation for this device was reviewed and the device met all quality and manufacturing release criteria.Submission of this report does not, in itself, represent a conclusion by the manufacturer and/or authorized representative or the national competent authority that the content of this report is complete or accurate, that the medical device(s) listed failed in any manner and/or that the medical device(s) caused or contributed to the alleged death or deterioration in the state of the health of any person.
|
Internal reference: (b)(4).The returned device was visually and microscopically inspected and damage was observed.The catheter was separated in two sections at the joint between the expanded single lumen (esl) and the scanner.Sanguineous material was observed at the separation section, missing material of the expanded single lumen (esl) was observed on this section, also rough edges.The remaining catheter shaft was intact.By report, the device was stuck and a snare was used to free the device.Though we cannot conclusively determine when and how the failure occurred, strain, impact, and forces associated with use can affect the integrity of the electrical connections within the device.Submission of this report does not, in itself, represent a conclusion by the manufacturer and/or authorized representative or the national competent authority that the content of this report is complete or accurate, that the medical device(s) listed failed in any manner and/or that the medical device(s) caused or contributed to the alleged death or deterioration in the state of the health of any person.
|