On 10mar2019, grifols customer blood assurance reported differing hiv-1 results between a master pool (mp) of 16 donors and an individual donor that was tested with the procleix ultrio plus assay.The mp was tested in a single replicate in ultrio plus master lot 700030 on the tigris instrument and the result was (b)(6).One individual component of the mp was (b)(6) on prism anti-hiv1/2 assay.That individual component was also (b)(6) for confirmatory western blot.An alternate sample from the frozen plasma unit of the same individual donor was tested in ultrio plus and hiv-1, hcv and hbv discriminatory assays.It was (b)(6) in ultrio plus and dhiv assays, and (b)(6) in dhcv and dhbv assays.This alternate sample was also (b)(6) in the western blot.The customer considers the ultrio plus (b)(6) result for the mp a "(b)(6)".Customer data is listed below.Unit # (b)(6) was added to master pool (b)(6) on (b)(6) /2019.(b)(6) was tested with ultrio plus on tigris instrument (b)(4) on (b)(6) 2019, (b)(6).(b)(6) was tested with prism anti-hiv1/2 assay, (b)(6) results.(b)(6) was sent for confirmatory western blot testing, (b)(6) confirmatory results.Alternate samples were tested from the frozen plasma unit associated with unit # (b)(6) under non-donor # (b)(6).Ultrio plus: (b)(6).Dhiv: (b)(6).Dhbv: (b)(6).Dhcv: (b)(6).The unit was not released for use based on results obtained.An investigation was completed.A review of the quality control data for ultrio plus ml 700030 was performed.There were no related quality events found for this lot of product and the product met all release criteria.Remaining sample from the individual donor plasma was sent to gds.It was then tested in the aptima hiv-1 quant assay.(b)(6) was detected in the specimen, but it was at a titer below the limit of quantification of the assay (below 30 copies/ml (b)(6)).Based on the customer data and the investigational data, the ultrio plus assay and tigris instrument performed as expected.The individual donor had a (b)(6).Dilution of the individual donor into a pool of 16 caused the titer of the pool specimen to be below the limit of detection of the ultrio plus assay.No further information is expected.This is considered the final report.
|