• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION TRAPEZOID RX; LITHOTRIPTOR, BILIARY MECHANICAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION TRAPEZOID RX; LITHOTRIPTOR, BILIARY MECHANICAL Back to Search Results
Model Number M00510880
Device Problem Separation Failure (2547)
Patient Problem No Code Available (3191)
Event Date 03/13/2019
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).The device has not been received for analysis.Upon receipt and completion of the failure analysis of the complaint device, if there is any further relevant information from that review, a supplemental mdr will be filed.
 
Event Description
It was reported to boston scientific corporation that a trapezoid rx device was used for an endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ercp) procedure with calculi extraction performed in the common bile duct on (b)(6) 2019.According to the complainant, during the procedure, the basket caught the 10-12mm stone.The stone was attempted to be crushed using an alliance handle; however, the stone was unable to be crushed.The tip of the basket would not deploy, therefore trapping the stone inside the basket.The procedure was concluded at this time, and on (b)(6) 2019, the patient underwent biliary tract exploration for extraction of the basket.The patient's condition at the conclusion of the procedures was reported to be stable.
 
Event Description
It was reported to boston scientific corporation that a trapezoid rx device was used for an endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ercp) procedure with calculi extraction performed in the common bile duct on (b)(6) 2019.According to the complainant, during the procedure, the basket caught the 10-12mm stone.The stone was attempted to be crushed using an alliance handle; however, the stone was unable to be crushed.The tip of the basket would not deploy, therefore trapping the stone inside the basket.The procedure was concluded at this time, and on (b)(6) 2019, the patient underwent biliary tract exploration for extraction of the basket.The patient's condition at the conclusion of the procedures was reported to be stable.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Block h6: patient code 3191 captures the reportable event of surgery.Device code 2547 captures the reportable event of tip failure to separate.Block h10: visual analysis found the returned device divided in two different parts.The working length (including the coil and sheath) was found cut at its proximal end (distal end of the heat shrink).The cut section of the unit showed drag marks, indicating the use of an unknown tool to perform the cut.Moreover, the coil was found to be kinked in several locations and stretched.Residues were present in the device indicating use and handling.Additionally, it was noted that the pull wire (including the basket) was pulled out from the internal section of the coil assembly, and the pull wire/basket were not returned for inspection; hence product analysis could not be performed for this part of the unit and specifically to the tip, which is the defective part reported by the user; consequently, not confirming the reported complaint.The calculi in the complaint was reported to be 10--12 mm.Per the dfu, the trapezoid rx wireguided retrieval basket 3 cm basket is designed for crushing calculus larger than 1.5 cm (15 mm)) in diameter."with the device being used to crush a calculus outside of the size the product was designed for, the unit could not be effective during its use.It is highly possible that the product was removed from the patient in an incorrect way, as the tip of the basket would be unable to detach properly since the stone was smaller than the basket is designed for, and the force needed to detach the tip would not be enough.Based on all the gathered information and the inspection performed, it was determined that the issue reported by the user (tip failure to separate), could have been generated due to the incorrect use of the device by the user.Therefore, the most probable root cause is unintended use error caused or contributed to event since it is most likely that the interaction between the user and device or sample, including unintended inappropriate use of the device and incorrect sample preparation, caused or contributed to the error.A review of the device history record (dhr) was performed and confirmed that this device met all material, assembly and performance specifications.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TRAPEZOID RX
Type of Device
LITHOTRIPTOR, BILIARY MECHANICAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
300 boston scientific way
marlborough MA 01752
MDR Report Key8492442
MDR Text Key141228939
Report Number3005099803-2019-01691
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LQC
UDI-Device Identifier08714729296393
UDI-Public08714729296393
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
K040447
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 05/29/2019
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date10/17/2019
Device Model NumberM00510880
Device Catalogue Number1088
Device Lot Number0022806993
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer04/05/2019
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 03/13/2019
Initial Date FDA Received04/08/2019
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received05/03/2019
Supplement Dates FDA Received05/29/2019
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age80 YR
Patient Weight70
-
-