• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO. INTERSTIM II; STIMULATOR, ELECTRICAL, IMPLANTABLE, FOR INCONTINENCE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO. INTERSTIM II; STIMULATOR, ELECTRICAL, IMPLANTABLE, FOR INCONTINENCE Back to Search Results
Model Number 3058
Device Problems Break (1069); Contamination (1120)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 03/07/2019
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Other relevant device(s) are: product id: 3889, serial/lot #: unknown.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Information was received from a manufacturer representative (rep) regarding a patient implanted with a neurostimulator.It was reported that the lead broke during the procedure while connecting the stimulator.It was noted that the patient was ok.It was also noted that the lead may have broken due to manipulation; the rep thought the lead broke by manipulation by fastening the screw too tight.After this event, the stimulator wasn't sterile anymore.A new lead and stimulator were implanted, and the issue was resolved.The patient was alive with no injury.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Additional information received from the manufacturing representative reported that they spoke with the implanting physician and the event was caused by manipulation while disconnecting from the old extension.There was no problem with material and the event was solved on the day it happened with a new electrode and stimulator.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Analysis of the returned lead (lot # unknown) found that the proximal connector was pulled off/out.A distal and a proximal segment of the lead were received for analysis.No other segments were received.The proximal segment measured 0.4 cm and the distal segment measured 26 cm.Visual inspection of the lead segments revealed that a small part of the proximal end was stuck inside the connector port of the ins.Visual inspection of the conductors revealed that conductors were stretched, conductor coils were crushed, and conductors were cut.Visual inspection of the insulation revealed cosmetic environmental stress cracking (esc), cut through body insulation with the lead segmented, and melted outer insulation.Visual inspection of the electrode end revealed that the distal end was stretched.Visual inspection of the tines revealed that the radiopaque sleeve was crushed, some of the tines were folded back, and there was esc on the tines.Electrical testing determined that the continuity of the conductors was acceptable.There were no shorts observed between the conductors.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
INTERSTIM II
Type of Device
STIMULATOR, ELECTRICAL, IMPLANTABLE, FOR INCONTINENCE
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO.
road 31, km. 24, hm 4
ceiba norte industrial park
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO.
road 31, km. 24, hm 4
ceiba norte industrial park
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer Contact
lisa woodward clark
7000 central avenue ne rcw215
minneapolis, MN 55432
7635263920
MDR Report Key8497599
MDR Text Key141394182
Report Number3004209178-2019-07037
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code EZW
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeBE
PMA/PMN Number
P970004
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 07/12/2019
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date05/28/2020
Device Model Number3058
Device Catalogue Number3058
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer03/25/2019
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 03/14/2019
Initial Date FDA Received04/09/2019
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received05/07/2019
07/11/2019
Supplement Dates FDA Received05/23/2019
07/12/2019
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured12/03/2018
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age57 YR
-
-