The patient was undergoing a thrombectomy procedure in the middle cerebral artery (mca) using a penumbra engine (engine) and a penumbra engine canister (canister).During the procedure, the physician reported that the canister would not seat properly and would not aspirate properly.As a result, the engine had become saturated with blood where it comes into contact with the canister and blood had dripped down onto the stem of the engine where the canister sits.The physician then decided to remove the engine to prevent blood from being aspirated into the pump body and found that the grey foam piece on the canister that comes into contact with the engine was missing.The engine was, therefore, no longer used in the procedure, and the procedure was completed using a penumbra system aspiration pump max (pump max).There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
|
Please note that the following sections were inadvertently missed on the initial mfr report and are being included on this follow-up #01 mfr report: 1.Lot #.2.Serial #.3.Device manufacture date.Results: no blood was present on the aspiration interface of the penumbra engine (engine).Conclusions: evaluation of the returned engine revealed a device capable of producing sufficient vacuum pressure.During functional testing, the engine was able to generate a vacuum pressure in specification with a demonstration canister.A substance resembling dried blood was present on the bottom of the canister well.The canister identified in the procedure was not returned for evaluation.Penumbra engines are inspected at incoming quality control which includes a visual inspection as well as a verification of test results to ensure specifications for each output are met.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.This report is associated with mfr report number: 3005168196-2019-00748.
|