Model Number QD22 |
Device Problems
Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method (2017); Insufficient Information (3190)
|
Patient Problems
Perforation (2001); No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
|
Event Date 04/02/2019 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Vascular perforations may occur with the use of several of our devices.A perforation is typically the result of excessive force combined with challenging anatomy and not a malfunction of the device.If there is a confirmed malfunction associated with this event, it should be captured along with any adverse event that resulted.If no known malfunction was associated with the event, capture the adverse event.In this case, there was perforation of the pulmonary artery by the venous cannula.The device was not returned for evaluation as it was discarded.Based on the available information the root cause of the event was likely due to patient and procedural factors.The device history record (dhr) was not able to be reviewed as the device lot number was not provided.Edwards will continue to review and monitor all events.Trends are monitored on a monthly basis and if action is required, appropriate investigation will be performed.
|
|
Event Description
|
Edwards received information that during placement of the venous cannula of an unknown size there was perforation of the pulmonary artery.No complications to the patient.Patient is well in the icu and recovering.No allegation of malfunction against the venous cannula.Event was attributed to user error.The venous cannula was discarded post procedure.
|
|
Event Description
|
Edwards received information that during placement of the venous cannula of an unknown size there was perforation of the pulmonary artery.The rep was not at the case and the lot number was not available.No complications to the patient.Patient is well in the icu and recovering.No allegation of malfunction against the venous cannula.Event was attributed to user error.The venous cannula was discarded post procedure.As reported the case was booked as a minimally invasive mitral repair, and the resultant procedure was a full sternotomy with mitral valve repair.Apulmonary vent catheter catheter were placed by anesthesia without problems.The surgeon believes that when he was passing up the venous cannula catheter, he may have pushed the pulmonary vent catheter forward causing the tear in the pulmonary artery.The pulmonary vent catheter was placed in the right ij and the venous cannula was placed via the right femoral vein up into the superior vena cava.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Corrected data: event.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
An engineering evaluation was performed and a manufacturing, supplier, design, ifu, and labeling defect were not confirmed.The trend was reviewed and found to be in control.The root cause was adverse event attributed to user error.No further actions are required.Edwards will continue to review and monitor all events.Trends are monitored on a monthly basis and if action is required, appropriate investigation will be performed.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Corrected data: f10, h6.Reference capa-20-00141.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|