• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION RX CYTOLOGY BRUSH; ENDOSCOPIC CYTOLOGY BRUSH

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION RX CYTOLOGY BRUSH; ENDOSCOPIC CYTOLOGY BRUSH Back to Search Results
Model Number M00545000
Device Problems Break (1069); Mechanical Problem (1384)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 03/12/2019
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Investigation results: an rx cytology brush was returned for analysis.A visual analysis revealed that the working length (extrusion and pull wire) was kinked in several locations.The handle was actuated and the brush was unable to extend.The device was disassembled and it was observed that the pull wire was broken and kinked adjacent to the handle cannula joint.It is most likely that procedural or anatomical factors encountered during procedure could have affected the device performance and its integrity.Likely, the failures found (pull wire/catheter kinked, pull wire broken) were caused due to manipulation as the customer brushed back and forth during the testing/use of the device.Handling and manipulation of the device can lead to kinking of the catheter and pull wire.This condition can cause difficulties to extend the brush.Force applied to the handle in order to extend the brush can result in kinking the pull wire at handle cannula joint, also continued movements of the handle can result in pull wire breakage.Based on the information available and the analysis performed, the most probable root cause is "adverse event related to procedure".A review of the device history record (dhr) was performed and confirmed that this device met all material, assembly and performance specifications at the time of release for distribution.
 
Event Description
It was reported to boston scientific corporation that an rx cytology brush was used in the common bile duct during an endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ercp) procedure performed on (b)(6) 2019.According to the complainant, during the procedure, the brush was unable to extend out of the catheter.A second brush was used, however the same issue occured.The procedure was then completed with a third rx cytology brush.There were no patient complications reported as a result of this event.The patient condition following the procedure was reported to be stable.Note: this event has been deemed an mdr-reportable event based on the investigation results which revealed that the pull wire was broken.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
RX CYTOLOGY BRUSH
Type of Device
ENDOSCOPIC CYTOLOGY BRUSH
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
300 boston scientific way
marlborough MA 01752
Manufacturer (Section G)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
780 brookside drive
spencer IN 47460
Manufacturer Contact
carole morley
300 boston scientific way
marlborough, MA 01752
5086834015
MDR Report Key8573628
MDR Text Key143943881
Report Number3005099803-2019-02306
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FDX
UDI-Device Identifier08714729268628
UDI-Public08714729268628
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K930348
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 05/02/2019
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date01/29/2021
Device Model NumberM00545000
Device Catalogue Number4500
Device Lot Number0023268676
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer04/01/2019
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 04/26/2019
Initial Date FDA Received05/02/2019
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured02/01/2019
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-