Age at time of event: 18 years or older.Device evaluated by mfr: the device was returned for analysis.The returned complaint device consisted of a rotablator rotalink plus device.The advancer unit and burr catheter were received together.The handshake connection, sheath, coil, burr and annulus were microscopically and visually examined.The sheath is completely torn/separated in 3 locations: 98.4cm from the strain relief, 100.2cm from the strain relief and 107.3cm from the strain relief.Microscopic examination of the device revealed that the annulus was damaged and not rounded which is consistent with damage seen with the use of a rotawire.The coil is stretched.Functional testing was performed by connecting the advancer to the rotablator control console system.The rotablator system was able to reach optimum speed with no issues.Inspection of the remainder of the device presented no other damage or irregularities.There was no evidence of any damage or irregularities contributing to the reported difficulty, which could not be confirmed because the clinical circumstances could not be replicated.
|
Reportable based on device analysis completed on 09-may-2019.It was reported that the device was unable to cross the lesion.A 1.75mm rotalink plus was selected for use.During the procedure, it was noted that the device was unable to cross the lesion.The procedure was completed with a different device.No patient complications were reported.However, device analysis revealed that the sheath is completely torn/separated in 3 locations: 98.4cm from the strain relief, 100.2cm from the strain relief and 107.3cm from the strain relief.
|