• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ALCON RESEARCH, LLC - IRVINE TECHNOLOGY CENTER CENTURION VISION SYSTEM; UNIT, PHACOFRAGMENTATION

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ALCON RESEARCH, LLC - IRVINE TECHNOLOGY CENTER CENTURION VISION SYSTEM; UNIT, PHACOFRAGMENTATION Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 8065753057
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problem Skin Tears (2516)
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Investigation including root cause analysis is in progress.A supplemental mdr will be filed as necessary in accordance with 21 cfr 803.56 when additional reportable information becomes available.The manufacturer internal reference number is: (b)(4).
 
Event Description
A healthcare professional reported a system message displayed and the patient experienced a couple of tears in the anterior capsule.Additional information has been requested.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Posterior capsule (pc) tear is a potential consequence of cataract extraction by predisposition to pc tear or zonular dehiscence can be influenced by many factors including, but not limited to, congenital posterior lenticonus, posterior sub capsular (psc) cataract, poor visibility secondary to patients comorbidity [ie.Dense arcus, pterygium, band keratopathy, corneal scars, interstitial keratitis], poor microscope illumination [red reflex], ergonomic obstacles, limited intraocular working space, abnormally long or short axial lengths, pseudoexfoliation, zonular laxity, poor dilation, intraoperative floppy iris syndrome (ifis), dense cataracts, asteroid hyalosis, or inadvertent patient movement.The conditions that increase the risk of pc tear during phacoemulsification include ergonomic obstacles, limited intraocular working space, poor visualization, increased nuclear size and density, weakened zonule, a radial tear in the capsulorhexis, and an inability to rotate the nucleus or epinucleus.These conditions may arise either because of the ocular anatomy, or because of surgical technique.There is no evidence contained within the reported information at this time that indicates that the design or performance of the system had any effect on the integrity of the posterior capsule.The vision system operator¿s manual includes a warning: ensure that appropriate system parameters and system settings are selected prior to starting the procedure.Adjusting aspiration rates or vacuum limits above the preset values, or lowering the intraocular pressure (iop) or iv pole below the preset values, may cause chamber shallowing or collapse which may result in patient injury.When filling handpiece test chamber, if stream of fluid is weak or absent, good fluidics response will be jeopardized.Good clinical practice dictates the testing for adequate irrigation and aspiration flow prior to entering the eye.The company service representative examined the system and was able to replicate the reported sm [pump speed failure] displaying.The fluidics module and the fluidics printed circuit board (pcb) were replaced to address the reported event of sm.The system was then tested and met all product specifications.The system manufacturing device history record (dhr) was reviewed.Based on qa assessment, the product met specifications at the time of release.The fluidics module and the fluidics printed circuit board (pcb) was received and a visual assessment of the returned fluidics printed circuit board (pcb) found no visual nonconformities.The sample was installed into a calibrated vision system, where it was found to meet specifications.The fluidics module was received and tested, where it was found to have a worn o-ring, which would have caused the sm [pump speed failure].Unrelated to the reported event, the sample was also found to have another type of worn o-ring.After replacing both o-rings, the fluidics module was found to meet specifications.However, the reported event of the system being involved in a procedure in which the patient received tears in their anterior chamber was unable to be confirmed.The root cause of the reported event of sm displaying can be attributed to the worn o-ring.The manufacturer internal reference number is: (b)(4).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
CENTURION VISION SYSTEM
Type of Device
UNIT, PHACOFRAGMENTATION
Manufacturer (Section D)
ALCON RESEARCH, LLC - IRVINE TECHNOLOGY CENTER
15800 alton parkway
irvine CA 92618
MDR Report Key8654617
MDR Text Key146616359
Report Number2028159-2019-00972
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HQC
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
K161794
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 09/26/2019
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number8065753057
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer06/05/2019
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 05/09/2019
Initial Date FDA Received05/30/2019
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received09/24/2019
Supplement Dates FDA Received09/26/2019
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
-
-