The reported event was confirmed as product was returned and visual inspection of the returned tasp found signs of repeated use (nicked or gouged) and is fractured on medial side of post, all pieces returned.Evaluation of the returned device identified the fracture was consistent with the tasp fractures analyzed in a zrm which identified that the common failure modes for the tasp devices include either bending overload or low cycle fatigue culminating in bending overload as evident by the presence of hackle marks, river lines, and striation features on the fracture surface.Device history record (dhr) was reviewed for deviations and/ or anomalies with no deviations/ anomalies identified.Root cause could not be determined.If any further information is found which would change or alter any conclusions or information, a supplemental will be filed accordingly.Zimmer biomet will continue to monitor for trends.
|